Author: Tyler Durden
* * * * *
One point we’ve been particularly keen on driving home since the beginning of Russian airstrikes in Syria is that The Kremlin’s move to step in on behalf of Bashar al-Assad along with Vladimir Putin’s open “invitation” to Washington with regard to joining forces in the fight against terrorism effectively let the cat out of the proverbial bag.
That is, it simply wasn’t possible for the U.S. to explain why the Pentagon refused to partner with the Russians without admitting that 1) the government views Assad, Russia, and Iran as a greater threat than ISIS, and; 2) Washington and its regional allies don’t necessarily want to see Sunni extremism wiped out in Syria and Iraq.
Admitting either one of those points would be devastating from a public relations perspective.
No amount of Russophobic propaganda and/or looped video clips of the Ayatollah ranting against the U.S. would be enough to convince the public that Moscow and Tehran are a greater threat than the black flag-waving jihadists beheading Westerners and burning Jordanian pilots alive in Hollywood-esque video clips; and so, The White House has been forced to scramble around in a desperate attempt to salvage the narrative.
Well, it hasn’t worked.
With each passing week, more and more people are beginning to ask the kinds of questions the Pentagon and CIA most assuredly do not want to answer.
And now, U.S. Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) is calling out Washington’s effort to oust Assad as both “counterproductive” and “illegal.”
In the following priceless video clip, Gabbard accuses the CIA of arming the very same terrorists who The White House insists are "our sworn enemy" and all but tells the American public that the government is lying to them and may end up inadvertently starting “World War III.”