Hat-Tip: (Anonymous)
Author: Tyler Durden
* * *
* *
One point we’ve been particularly keen on driving home
since the beginning of Russian airstrikes in Syria is that The Kremlin’s move
to step in on behalf of Bashar al-Assad along with Vladimir Putin’s open
“invitation” to Washington with regard to joining forces in the fight against
terrorism effectively let the cat out of the proverbial bag.
That is, it simply wasn’t possible for the U.S. to
explain why the Pentagon refused to partner with the Russians without admitting
that 1) the government views Assad, Russia, and Iran as a greater threat than
ISIS, and; 2) Washington and its regional allies don’t necessarily want to see
Sunni extremism wiped out in Syria and Iraq.
Admitting either one of those points would be devastating
from a public relations perspective.
No amount of Russophobic propaganda and/or looped video
clips of the Ayatollah ranting against the U.S. would be enough to convince the
public that Moscow and Tehran are a greater threat than the black flag-waving
jihadists beheading Westerners and burning Jordanian pilots alive in Hollywood-esque
video clips; and so, The White House has been forced to scramble around in a
desperate attempt to salvage the narrative.
Well, it hasn’t worked.
With each passing week, more and more people are
beginning to ask the kinds of questions the Pentagon and CIA most assuredly do
not want to answer.
And now, U.S.
Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) is calling out Washington’s effort to oust
Assad as both “counterproductive” and “illegal.”
In the following priceless video clip, Gabbard accuses
the CIA of arming the very same terrorists who The White House insists are
"our sworn enemy" and all but tells the American public that the
government is lying to them and may end up inadvertently starting “World War
III.”
No comments:
Post a Comment