Victor Davis Hanson writing in NRO
* * *
* *
* I'D BE VERY INTERESTED IN GETTING A REACTION TO THIS
FROM MY "NEPHEW" WHO ATTENDED HARVARD AND UPON GRADUATION - WITH A
LIBERAL ARTS DEGREE - IMMEDIATELY GOT A HIGH-PAYING (NICE BONUS TOO)
HIGH-STATUS CONSULTING JOB.
* OH... AND I'D ALSO LOVE TO HAVE HIS TAKE ON THOSE IDIOTS AT YALE!
$ $ $ $ $
A recent study published by the National Academy of
Sciences, co-authored by a Nobel laureate, revealed a spiraling death rate
since 1999 of Americans described as middle-aged (45 to 54),
middle/working-class (without a college degree) whites (apparently
self-identified as such). That is not supposed to happen to sizable demographic
groups in our postmodern societies.
The regression to shortened lifespans is more akin to the
trend in the old Soviet Union than in the United States.
The supposed culprits are inordinate use of alcohol and
drugs (both legal and illegal), psycho-social maladies leading to increased
suicide, and legal and financial problems.
In search of root causes, are we to think that the white
working class eats less healthy foods than, say, blacks and Hispanics of the
same class?
Do whites visit the doctor less?
Are they more prone by nature to disease and culturally
induced illnesses?
The answer seems: Probably not.
The study’s findings belie conventional wisdom, which has
focused almost exclusively on the plight of minorities, who in many areas have
proven unable to achieve parity, ostensibly because of endemic and lethal white
racism. Indeed, the authors, Nobel Laureate Angus Deaton and his wife, Anne
Case, found their study rejected by several prestigious medical journals.
Again, their conclusions are explosive — given that they raise questions about
the conventional wisdom that “white privilege” trumps class considerations and
is the key driver of minority despair and the inability to ensure equality of
result.
We know whom Deaton and Case are studying by simply
watching reality television. An entire genre has arisen of filming in mediis
rebus poor, overweight, working-class loggers, truck drivers, fishermen,
hunters, trappers, and the underemployed, who seem to win audiences by their
now ossified muscular jobs and screw-you autonomy, and who apparently provide
vicarious amusement through their anti-metrosexual appearance, their drawls,
and their supposedly oafish working-class culture.
Pajama Boys and the subjects of Esquire articles, these
vanishing Alaskans, Montanans, and Alabamians are not.
When Hollywood seeks its generic villains — terrorists,
crime-syndicate members, non-American bogeymen — they are increasingly of three
types: working-class racist whites with Southern accents, Russian émigrés, and
South African racists. Only that way do directors safely avoid the thought
police.
Most commentators on the Deaton–Case article quickly
pointed to obvious hypotheses for the disappearance of well-paying muscular
jobs and the consequences to the white working class. After a lifetime of
residence in the impoverished Central Valley of California, I can offer
anecdotal agreement. The vast majority of so-called working-class whites with
whom I graduated from high school did not go to college. Yet they started off
their working lives in 1971 with good prospects at the nearby
trailer-manufacturing plant, the fruit processor, the man-lift factory, and an
array of high-paying welding and fabrication jobs. All such employment has now
disappeared through globalization.
Most of my classmates did not return to school. The ones
whom I still keep up with are not enjoying the livelihoods that their parents
took for granted. Instead, government and the protocols of government hiring
were the new ways to upward mobility in California.
The same negative trajectory was the case for family
farms.
I wrote about the destruction of the small-farming class
in Fields without Dreams (1996) and The Land Was Everything (2000). After 1970,
our local agrarian mosaic was insidiously eroded by globalization, crashing
commodity prices, vast increases in state and federal regulation, bureaucratic
busybodies, increasing litigation and the consequent need for ever more
expensive insurance, and corporate vertical integration from farm to consumer.
I used to know dozens of families who farmed in my
general vicinity. All are gone; the land, to the degree there was still equity,
was sold to large conglomerates.
In my own family, my two siblings make far less than did
our parents and grandparents, and most of my nieces and nephews found it
difficult to find well-paying blue-collar work once our family farm was
liquidated.
But is there more to the despair that drives people to
drugs, drink, and a culture of nihilism than just the disappearance of
well-paying jobs? Some conservatives have more controversially pointed to the constant
drumbeat of racial polarization, summed up best by the sloganeering of “white
privilege.”
Academics and activists like Elizabeth Warren, Ward
Churchill, Rachel Dolezal, and Shaun King, who all successfully invented and
profited from minority identities, are emblematic of the trend that being white
is now less advantageous in careerist terms than is minority status.
Eric Holder’s children will be more likely to be admitted
to Stanford than a straight-A, high-test-score white male from an impoverished
family in Great Falls, on the argument that racial and gender identity renders
class irrelevant.
As a professor at California State University, Fresno,
over some 21 years, I had hundreds of conversations with working-class white
kids from Merced to Bakersfield, who had stellar academic records in the
humanities and who wished to go to top law schools or Ph.D. programs. I ended
up offering them roughly the following caveat: “I’m afraid the chances of you
as a white male from Fresno State being admitted to a top program are almost
nil.” I was being neither alarmist nor nihilist, but simply reflecting the
experience of my own lobbying efforts for brilliant students to gain admittance
to top-ranked graduate programs.
In fact, over those 21 years, we sent dozens of bright
students to schools such as Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and Berkeley.
In almost every case, however, they were women or classified as minorities. So
blatant was the discrimination, it became a running joke along the following
lines: “Professor Hanson, I’m a white guy from Tulare. Can you at least help me
get into UC Riverside?”
One of the most gifted classics students I ever taught
once came to my office, anguished that he had been admitted only to Penn State
(which has a fine classics Ph.D. program), while someone quite talented but
perhaps with a less stellar record had been offered a five-year mega-package of
free tuition and expenses to a Princeton Ph.D. program. I could only shrug to
my student, “Well, yes, your record and test scores may be somewhat more
impressive, but he too is bright and he is an illegal alien. You are a white
working-class statistic.”
In ethical terms I thought such cynicism was more helpful
than promulgating the lie that the elites who run graduate admissions evaluate
only on the basis of merit.
It is often said that the Obama administration hit on a
successful formula when it won two presidential elections by energizing blacks
and Latinos to register and turn out in record numbers — to such a degree that
the new majorities more than made up for lost working-class white Democratic
voters. Clearly the sloganeering and slurs of President Obama and his
subordinates (typical white person, clingers, punish our enemies, my people,
nation of cowards, get in their face, etc.) have been useful over the last
eight years in ginning up racial solidarity, just as quite improper presidential
commentary on ongoing hot-button legal cases (Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown,
etc.) reinforced racial polarization and grievance.
Hillary Clinton’s campaign — in its embrace of illegal
immigration, sanctuary cities, Black Lives Matter, the fable of one in four
campus women being sexually assaulted, etc. — is desperate to ensure that
Obama’s community-organizing, separatist formula can be transferred to a mature
white lady. Hillary is now aiming at the “hands up, don’t shoot,” Jorge Ramos,
Sandra Fluke, Lena Dunham set, not the Duck Dynasty bunch or a dazed Jim Webb.
Still, white working-class psychological despair is not
alone attributable to lack of good jobs, or affirmative action, or the constant
slur of so-called white privilege. There is a class element at the heart of the
nihilism — or, rather, the furor at the prevailing hypocrisy. Whites who really
do enjoy privilege, whether defined by income, capital, tony Ivy League
degrees, or family connections and influence, are the worst purveyors of
ridicule of the white working class.
The elite media despised Sarah Palin for her gaffes,
while it ignored Washington insider Joe Biden’s fantasies about FDR delivering
a TV address as president in 1929.
When Cornel West, or Eric Holder, or Melissa
Harris-Perry, or Van Jones starts in on cable news whining about white privilege,
whom are they addressing? The unemployed welder in South Carolina? The tractor
driver outside Merced? The out-of-work coal miner in the Appalachians? Or is it
all rather in-house scapegoating between black and white elites of the same
class over the allotment of academic, media, and government privilege?
Or perhaps it is worse still. Does Chris Matthews blast
“whites” to ensure exemption for his own largely segregated existence?
Do Cornel West and Jeremiah Wright drone on about white
privilege because they suspect that there is more class disparity in the black
community than in the white, as evidenced by their own opportunistic careers as
self-appointed auditors of fellow elites?
Does Mark Zuckerberg attack his country’s supposedly
illiberal immigration policies at the Mexican estate of Carlos Slim so that he
can better rationalize why he has bought up the houses surrounding his own to
ensure the right kind of neighbors?
Did Bill Gates slam the evils of capitalism only after he
made billions by ruthlessly eliminating Microsoft’s competition in the 1980s?
To the white working class, the verbiage about privilege
and race is an incestuous spat among the ridiculous winners of the contemporary
rat race, better turned off and drowned out.
In the last ten years I have frequently heard
working-class whites use terms such as “stupid white people” or “wealthy white
people” — a ridiculed class that defends its privilege and perks by loudly
proclaiming ideologies whose consequences it has the money and power to
navigate around, whether it be illegal immigration, affirmative action, or
inner-city crime.
A careerist middle-class product like Ta-Nehisi Coates
has created an entire lucrative industry based on racial disparagement, having
cultivated a love–hate relationship with fawning white urban elites rather than
interacting with working-class rural whites. It is ironic that Coates would
likely be treated more as an individual if he were working at a lumber mill in
rural Georgia with poor whites, whereas he is regarded as a totem by
condescending and guilt-plagued Ivy League grandees.
The white working class is not blameless. Drug use,
illegitimacy, alcoholism, and violence are choices, not preordained fates. But
what drives this endangered class to fury is the constant refrain on
television, in Hollywood, on campus, and in politics and government — in our
culture at large — of those who are privileged and who hope to maintain and
expand that privilege in our racially polarized society by damning white people
who are not privileged.
The subtext of illegal immigration, government expansion,
and political activism is now race and gender, not class.
A poor white kid of 18 who came of age in the era of
diversity set-asides, not Jim Crow, can expect to gain no edge in hiring and
admissions owing to his race or gender. But he will find himself a target for
racist allegations by those who seek either profit or penance.
When Quentin Tarantino cites “white supremacy” as the
driver for his crude accusations against police, the con becomes laughable: He
seeks buffoonish atonement for his own films’ gratuitous n-word vulgarities and
the fact that he is worth $100 million and can buy exemption with cheap liberal
sloganeering for the enjoyment of his security-guaranteed privilege.
No comments:
Post a Comment