Broken record alert!
Yep... AGAIN with the "You Should Be Reading Taki'sMagazine" exhortation!
* * *
I’ll believe we have an unbiased media the moment they
start using the term “far left” as frequently as they use “far right.” But
don’t hold your breath, because you will surely die waiting.
The blood hadn’t even dried from the carnage in Paris
before the major media’s lackeys and lickspittles were issuing dire warnings
about a disturbing political trend in Europe. Despite the fact that Islamic
extremists spilled gallons of blood Friday night, the media’s respectable class
— those craven lackeys and lickspittles — did not seem in the least bit
terrified about Islamic terrorism, but rather about the “far right” gaining
traction in Europe.
“The Paris attacks will strengthen right-wing European
groups,” belched Market Watch.
“Far-right protests break out across France,” howled the
Express.
The Daily Mail equated “right-wing protesters” with
“anti-Muslim bigots.”
One shouldn’t expect any more or less from a media class
of paid prostitutes who for generations have sculpted a narrative that
blood-and-soil nationalist movements among non-whites are noble “indigenous
struggles,” whereas precisely the same sort of instincts constitute a toxic
burblin’ stew of “far-right extremism” when expressed among whites.
They follow a script where the primal urge for ethnic
survival among non-whites is righteous and empowering, whereas it’s the heart
of human darkness for whites — either individually or collectively — to exist
in any other state besides one of constant apology and retreat.
And then some hairy, holy-rolling Turds of Allah came
along and slaughtered 130-plus people, many of whom likely had been brainwashed
and peer-pressured into believing that “xenophobia” was a character defect
rather than a survival instinct.
France is the birthplace of the very concepts of “left”
and “right” as political terms. This false and pitifully reductive dichotomy
has had so much staying power that even those who deny the very existence of
race and gender seem convinced that the meanings of “left” and “right” are
etched in stone.
It doesn’t matter that these political nametags are the
very essence of “social constructs.” It matters not that what was called
“progressive” 100 years ago would be deemed far-right eugenic quackery these
days. It doesn’t matter that “liberal” used to mean the same as what
“libertarian” now does, even though the two terms are almost polar opposites
nowadays.
Simple minds suffer from a hyper-simplistic
classification mania, and no amount of persuasion can convince them that there
are more than two ways of looking at any given subject.
* YEP... HITS THE NAIL ON THE HEAD. MOST PEOPLE ARE...
STUPID.
* SERIOUSLY, FOLKS... "RIGHT" vs.
"LEFT" MAY BE CONVENIENT SHORTHAND...
(*SHRUG*)
* AND SURELY "LEFT" HAS REAL MEANING...
* BUT AS FOR "RIGHT"... THAT'S AN ENTIRELY
DIFFERENT KETTLE OF FISH. MANY WHO CLAIM TO BE "RIGHT" ARE ONLY
"RIGHT" IN THE EUROPEAN SENSE... IN THE GOP ESTABLISHMENT SENSE... IN
THE SENSE OF WANTING TO BE "IN" WITH THE OLIGARCHY. MY FRIENDS...
THIS ISN'T "RIGHT."
* THERE'S A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
"CONSERVATIVE" AND "RIGHT." THE NEOCONS ARE
"RIGHT." (AND IN A SENSE THEY'RE ALSO "LEFT.") THE
TRANSNATIONALISTS ARE "LEFT"... BUT ALSO NOTE... MANY FOLKS WHO CALL
THEMSELVES "CONSERVATIVES" - WHO RAIL AGAINST SUPPOSED
"ISOLATIONALISTS" (WHO REALLY DON'T EXIST AS SUCH) AND
"LIBERTARIANS" AND "FAIR TRADERS/ECONOMIC NATIONALISTS"
COUNT THEMSELVES AS "CONSERVATIVES." THEY'RE NOT.
* ANYWAY... BACK TO THE COLUMN...
The way many — if not most — people speak, one would
think it’s impossible for anyone to lean left economically and right
culturally, or vice versa, or any other possible combination that transcends
the rigid two-dimensional model.
Divvying the entire world up into two neatly sliced
watermelon halves — one marked “left” and the other “right” — ignores that
we’re not dealing with a simple two-dimensional line segment but rather a 3-D
constellation of intersecting line segments that run across an array of
spectrums including economics, culture, race, borders, and everything else
under the sun.
What has been repeated a gazillion times but has yet to
sink into the modern leftist’s soft skull is that at least in cultural terms,
Islam is about as “right wing” as it gets. It is intensely “patriarchal” and
“homophobic” and “sexist.” The average Muslim manifests far more of the
behaviors and attitudes that are routinely condemned as hateful and vile and
retrograde when they’re expressed by the purported bigots and xenophobes of the
Caucasian right wing.
And yet the average leftist coddles and defends Islam
because leftism’s hatred of patriarchy and homophobia and sexism is not nearly
as intense as its hatred of all things Western. No matter how right-wing it is
at heart, Islam is, at least for the time being, extraordinarily useful to the
left.
* I DON'T PAINT ISLAM WITH A BROAD BRUSH. NOR DO I FEEL
CONTEMPT FOR CULTURAL NORMS THAT IN MANY WAYS ARE QUITE IN KEEPING WITH MY
MORAL AND ETHICAL GROUNDING. WHETHER WE'RE TALKING MUSLIMS... OR CHRISTIANS OR
JEWS OR HINDUS OR ANIMISTS OR...
(*SHRUG*)
A TERRORIST IS A TERRORIST. A PIECE OF GARBAGE IS A PIECE
OF GARBAGE. AND A GOOD PERSON IS A GOOD PERSON.
So when the chattering classes chirp about an ominously
looming wave of “right-wing extremism” in Europe, it’s understood that they are
not talking about rampant gay-bashing or clit-snipping or slut-shaming in
Europe’s Islamic no-go zones.
* I'M KINDA ON BOARD WITH THE SLUT-SHAMING.
(*SHRUG*)
* AS TO THE GAY BASHING... I'M AGAINST IT... BUT I'M ALSO
AGAINST "GAY NORMING" AND ABSOLUTELY AGAINST CREATING A "GAY
HERO" MEME. (SEE: MODERN AMERICAN TV.)
Rather, they are referencing the simple desire for
indigenous Europeans to keep Europe culturally and ethnically European.
* I'M FOR THAT! KEEP ASIA ASIAN! KEEP AFRICA AFRICAN!
KEEP ARABIA ARAB! (AND SO ON AND SO FORTH...)
In this context, the left-right continuum involves
national borders — if you want them erased, you’re left wing, and if you want
walls and fences built, you’re not only “right wing,” you’re a “right wing
extremist” and a member of the “far right fringes.”
But this begs the question: Why do leftists consider it
outright sinister when Europeans wish for Europe to remain European both
culturally and ethnically? Isn’t in-group altruism the only way that groups
survive, especially when pitted against groups who don’t suffer from
self-hatred and who seek to eliminate all competitors?
Of course it is!
In this context, a “right-wing extremist” is a European
who simply wishes for Europe to remain European. It’s someone who rightly
discerns that the scabby hordes of so-called “refugees” flooding into Europe
from the Middle East do not come in peace or with the desire to assimilate;
they come instead to conquer and destroy. They come with a chip on their
shoulder and a score to settle. And they are being used as tools by Europe’s
elites to terrify and silence the masses.
In other words, a “right-wing extremist” is someone who
feels no need to die and be blotted from history’s pages simply because some
sheltered and pampered pansy tells them it’s the right thing to do. It is
someone who doesn’t feel compelled to sacrifice their continued cultural and
genetic existence on this planet merely to appease some sheltered elitist’s
tangled guilt complexes. It’s someone of European descent who sees it as a
character defect rather than a virtue to hate oneself.
No comments:
Post a Comment