And worse than my headache is the misinformation he
passes out to the rubes.
(*SIGH*)
George F. Will's latest column:
* * *
* *
The book atop the New York Times non-fiction...
(*GUFFAW*)
* "NON-FICTION." THAT'S A GOOD ONE!
(*STILL CHUCKLING*)
...bestseller list is a tissue of unsubstantiated
assertions.
Because of its vast readership...
* READ CHARLES MURRAY, FOLKS. PLEASE! OR SAMUEL HUNTINGTON!
(*CHUCKLE*)
O'Reilly's “Killing Reagan: The Violent Assault That
Changed a Presidency” by Fox News’s [resident idiot] and his collaborator,
Martin Dugard, will distort public understanding of Ronald Reagan’s presidency
more than hostile but conscientious scholars could.
(*SIGH*)
Styling himself an “investigative historian,” O’Reilly
purports to have "discovered" amazing facts that have escaped the
notice of real historians.
* BY THE WAY...
At the Reagan Library, where researchers must register,
records show that neither O’Reilly nor Dugard, who churn out a book a year,
used its resources.
* YEP...
(*SIGH*)
The book’s intimated hypothesis is that the trauma of the
March 1981 assassination attempt somehow triggered in Reagan a mental decline,
perhaps accelerating the Alzheimer’s disease that would not be diagnosed until
13 years later.
The book says Reagan was often addled to the point of
incompetence, causing senior advisers to contemplate using the Constitution’s
25th Amendment to remove him from office. Well.
* YES. "WELL" INDEED. TOTAL NONSENSE.
* BY THE WAY...
The book’s pretense of scholarship involves 151
footnotes, only one of which is even remotely pertinent to the book’s lurid
assertions. Almost all contain irrelevant tidbits (”Reagan’s hair was actually
brown”). The book’s two and a half pages of “sources” unspecifically and
implausibly refer to “FBI and CIA files,” “presidential libraries” and travel
“around the world.” They also cite Kitty Kelley’s scabrous 1991 Nancy Reagan
“biography,” a sewer of rumors and innuendos that probably is the source of the
sexual factoids O’Reilly and Dugard recycle.
* ONE MORE TIME, FOLKS... TO REPEAT:
At the Reagan Library, where researchers must register,
records show that neither O’Reilly nor Dugard, who churn out a book a year,
used its resources.
(*PURSED LIPS*)
Reagan was shot on the 70th day of his presidency. In the
next 2,853 days he produced an economic boom and the Cold War’s endgame.
Among O’Reilly’s “explanations” for Reagan’s supposed
combination of creativity and befuddlement are: He was brave; “on his bad days,
he couldn’t work” but on good days “he was brilliant;” Nancy Reagan was in
charge; it was “almost miraculous.”
(*ROLLING MY EYES*)
When Reagan’s unsatisfactory Chief of Staff Don Regan was
replaced by Howard Baker, a Baker aide wrote a memo that included slanderous
assessments of the president from some disgruntled Regan staffers. This memo,
later regretted by its author, became, O’Reilly says, the “centerpiece” of his
book.
* FIGURES.
On this flimsy reed he leans the fiction (refuted by
minute-by-minute records in the Reagan Library) that, in O’Reilly’s words, “a
lot of days” Reagan never left the White House’s second floor where he watched
“soap operas all day long.”
* O'REILLY IS SUCH A FRIGGIN' IDIOT...
(*JUST SHAKING MY HEAD*)
Ed Meese was, from Sacramento to Washington, Reagan’s
longest-serving adviser. George Shultz was Reagan’s confidant and secretary of
state. James Baker served Reagan as chief of staff and treasury secretary. None
was contacted in connection with the book.
(*SNORT FOLLOWED BY A SMIRK*)
Scores of Reagan’s White House aides would have shredded
the book’s preposterous premise, which might be why they were not interviewed.
* O'REILLY...
(*STILL SHAKING MY HEAD*)
For example, Mari Maseng worked with Reagan at the
beginning and the end of his presidency. She worked with him as a speechwriter
from 1981 to 1983. (As author of the speech he delivered at the Washington
Hilton, she was walking ahead of him when the would-be assassin fired.) She
returned to the White House in 1986 as director of public liaison. In 1988, as
communications director, she worked down the hall from the Oval Office, having
constant interactions with him. She saw no diminution of his physical energy or
mental acuity.
Dugard sought research advice from former representative
Christopher Cox (R-Calif.), who served in Reagan’s White House counsel’s
office. Cox put Dugard in touch with former California governor Pete Wilson and
several Reagan historians. Wilson and Cox warned that historians’ criticisms
could hurt the book’s reception. Then O’Reilly charged on Fox News that Wilson
and Cox somehow threatened him, adding gratuitously and falsely that Cox, as
chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, “presided over the mortgage
debacle that collapsed the economy in 2007,” an explanation of the autumn 2008
collapse that is simply weird.
* AGAIN... O'REILLY IS A MORON. IT REALLY IS THAT SIMPLE.
Cox put the book’s publisher in touch with Annelise
Anderson, who, with her late husband Marty, a longtime Reagan adviser, has
authored and edited serious books about Reagan. She was offered $5,000 and
given just one week to evaluate the manuscript. Having read it, she declined
compensation, saying mildly, “I don’t think this manuscript is ready for
publication.”
1 comment:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/11/06/oreilly_vs_george_will_youre_a_hack_a_reagan_loyalist_who_doesnt_want_the_truth_to_be_told.html
O'Reilly really needs to get the $hit kicked out of him.
At the very least he should be suspended for this "interview" with Will.
O'Reilly really is a bully. And in all the years I've been writing this blog, I don't recall ever feeling the need to call anyone a bully until now.
Post a Comment