Constitution? What Constitution? Rule of Law... L'Etat, c'est moi!
Geezus... when even the editors and publisher of The Hill feel the need to air the truth...
* * * * *
A newly leaked internal DHS memorandum produced for an off-the-record agency conclave reveals that the Obama administration is actively planning to circumvent a federal court injunction that suspended part of last November’s deferral-based amnesty initiative.
* "NIXONIAN" HAS NOTHING ON "OBAMIAN."
The document, apparently prepared as follow-up from a DHS “Regulations Retreat” last summer, appears sure to re-ignite concerns in Congress as well as federal judges in the Fifth Circuit.
* BULL$HIT. THE DEMOCRATS... THE LEFT... THEY DON'T CARE; AND WHILE SOME REPUBLICANS MAY ECHO CAPTAIN RENAULT'S "SHOCK" THAT THE LAW IS BEING BROKEN AT PRESIDENT OBAMA'S "ESTABLISHMENT," WE ALL KNOW THAT THEY'D MOST LIKELY BACK A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT ABUSING HIS POWERS IN LIKE MANNER.
* FOLKS... THERE'S NO SAVING THIS COUNTRY.
The Administration has already been criticized from the bench for handing out work permits to hundreds of thousands of deferred action beneficiaries, in direct violation of a district court’s order.
With the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals deciding any day now whether to deny the Administration’s request to reverse that injunction, this public leak has come at a critical juncture for U.S. enforcement policy.
* PLEASE. OBAMA WILL DO WHATEVER THE HELL HE WANTS TO. NO ONE CAN STOP HIM.
Last June, four months after Texas federal judge Andrew Hanen’s order to freeze President’s DAPA and Expanded DACA programs — disclosure: the Immigration Reform Law Institute has filed briefs in these cases — DHS’s immigration policy makers apparently held a “Regulations Retreat” to discuss “different options” for “open market Employment Authorization Document (EAD) regulatory changes.” (EAD is the statutory term for work permits.)
From a memo recording these discussions, we now know that the Obama DHS has, rather than pausing to allow the courts to assess the constitutionality of its enforcement nullification initiatives, been gearing up to roll out one or more of four plans drawn up at the meeting, each one designed to provide EADs to millions of non-immigrants, including those lawfully present and visa over-stayers, crippling the actual employment-based visa system on the federal statute-book.
* I LIKE THAT! "VISA OVER-STAYERS." AS TO "LAWFULLY PRESENT"... ONLY IF ONE BELIEVE OBAMA IS THE LAW.
The internal memo reveals four options of varying expansiveness, with option 1 providing EADs to “all individuals living in the United States,” including illegal aliens, visa-overstayers, and H-1B guest-workers, while option 4 provides EADs only to those on certain unexpired non-immigrant visas.
* WHAT DO YOU WANNA BET RYAN HAS BEEN "READ IN" ON THIS; PRIVATELY; "OFF THE RECORD;" NO PAPER TRAIL?
Giving EADs to any of the covered individuals, however, is in direct violation of Congress’s Immigration & Nationality Act and works to dramatically subvert our carefully wrought visa system.
* SO? WHAT'S CONGRESS GONNA DO ABOUT IT? WHAT ARE THE COURTS GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? IT'S NOT LIKE THE RULE OF LAW MATTERS TO MOST OF THESE SCUMBAGS.
As mentioned, the first plan the memo discusses basically entails giving EADs to anyone physically present in the country who until now has been prohibited from getting one. A major positive to this option, the memo reads, is that it would “address the needs of some of the intended deferred action population.”
* HOW'BOUT THE NEEDS OF THE COUNTRY? HOW'BOUT THE NEEDS - AND WANTS AND DESIRES - OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? HOW'BOUT... THE LAW...???
Although DHS doesn’t say it expressly, included here would be those 4.3 million people covered by the president’s DAPA and Expanded DACA programs whose benefits were supposed to have been halted in the Hanen decision.
* "SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN..."
On top of working around the Hanen injunction...
* "WORKING AROUND...?!?!" CUTE!
...this DHS plan would also dole out unrestricted EADs to those on temporary non-immigrant visas, such as H-1B-holders (their work authorizations being tied to their employers) and another 5 to 6 million illegal aliens thus far not covered by any of the President’s deferred action amnesty programs.
* YOU'RE READING THIS - RIGHT, FOLKS?
By claiming absolute authority to grant work authorization to any alien, regardless of status, DHS is in effect claiming it can unilaterally de-couple the 1986 IRCA work authorization statutes from the main body of U.S. visa law.
While DHS must still observe the statutory requirements for issuing visas, the emerging doctrine concedes, the administration now claims unprecedented discretionary power to permit anyone inside our borders to work.
* OBAMA CLAIMS THE POWERS OF A DICTATOR - AND MOST DEMOCRATS DO - AND WILL CONTINUE - TO SUPPORT HIM IN THIS.
* FOLKS... THERE'S BEEN A COUP. YES... BLOODLESS... BUT A COUP NEVERTHELESS. AND THE GOP HAS LARGELY GONE ALONG WITH IT.
The anonymous DHS policymakers state that a positive for this option is that it “could cover a greater number of individuals.” In a strikingly conclusory bit of bureaucratese, they state that because illegal aliens working in the country “have already had the U.S. labor market tested” it has been “demonstrated that their future employment won’t adversely affect U.S. workers.”
(*JUST SHAKING MY HEAD IN DISGUST*)
The labor market, in other words, has already been stress-tested through decades of foreign-labor dumping and the American working-class, which disproportionately includes minorities, working mothers, the elderly, and students, is doing just fine. Apparently, the fact that 66 million Americans and legal aliens are currently unemployed or out of the job-market was not a discussion point at the DHS “Retreat.”
Bottom line: The memo foreshadows more tactical offensives in a giant administrative amnesty for all 12 million illegal aliens who’ve broken our immigration laws (and many other laws) that will emerge before the next inaugural in January 2016.
According to the authors, one negative factor for granting EADs to illegal aliens, visa-overstayers, etc., is that they’ll still “face difficulties in pursuing permanent residence due to ineligibility or being subject to unlawful presence inadmissibility for which a waiver is required.” This is in reference to the reality that an EAD isn’t a green card and that eventually the EAD-beneficiaries are supposed to apply to ‘adjust their status,’ which cannot be done without showing evidence of lawful status. But this might change, they write. The DHS “macro-level policy goal”, we’re told, is to assist individuals to stay “until they are ready and able to become immigrants.” This would seem to say that DHS, the largest federal law enforcement agency in the nation, is banking on awarding those who’ve broken our laws and violated our national sovereignty.
Will the 26 plaintiff states that have challenged the President’s DAPA program bring this memo to the Fifth Circuit’s attention before they issue their closely-awaited decision?
If this document is indeed the cutting edge of Obama’s strategy for DHS to circumvent Judge Hanen’s injunction order, it would confirm the Administration’s bad faith and contempt both for the court and the law.