Melissa Quinn writing in the Daily
Signal
* * *
As the Senate gears up to debate the $1.1 trillion
omnibus spending bill...
* THE "OMNIBUS" PART BEING CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT
EVEN WHEN THEY CONTROL BOTH HOUSES OF CONGRESS, REPUBLICANS (LIKE DEMOCRATS)
REFUSE TO ACTUALLY PERFORM THE DUTIES (COMING UP WITH SPECIFIC BUDGETS) THAT THEY
WERE ELECTED TO PERFORM!
...conservative leaders are pushing back against a
measure floated by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell boosting the amount
of money political parties can spend in coordination with candidates.
* MCCONNELL WANTS THE ESTABLISHMENT TO HAVE EVEN MORE
POWER OVER LOCAL ELECTIONS...
(*SPITTING ON THE GROUND*)
In a letter circulated among conservative groups, nearly
50 conservative leaders Thursday rallied in opposition to a campaign finance
policy rider McConnell, R-Ky., will reportedly insert into the omnibus spending
bill.
McConnell’s measure would lift the amount of money political
parties can spend in coordination with a candidate.
“There is no doubt that campaign finance restrictions
need reform,” the signatories said. “However, the McConnell rider provides
preferential treatment to the Washington establishment and subordinates the
voices of those who contribute to other multi-candidate organizations.
Therefore, the Congress should not include this rider.”
* AGREED!
Congress faces a Dec. 11 deadline to pass a comprehensive
spending package, and lawmakers have already begun discussing a number of
policy riders — measures attached to the bill that create new policy or limit
how government funds can be spent — they hope to see included.
“The provision would apply to political parties only,
setting up a different standard between the parties and multi-candidate
committees,” the conservative leaders said. “Political contribution is a form
of free speech, which is protected by our Constitution and should not be
limited.”
The language of the policy rider has not yet been
released. However, in addition to receiving opposition from conservative
leaders, McConnell’s campaign finance measure also drew criticism from
lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
At a monthly gathering with reporters Wednesday, Rep. Jim
Jordan, R-Ohio, chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, said that his group of 40
conservative lawmakers would oppose McConnell’s measure. “We think it’s not the
direction we need to go unless you’re going to free up the restrictions on
everyone else,” Jordan said.
In a statement to The Daily Signal, Senate Conservatives
Fund President Ken Cuccinelli criticized the provision for serving as a way to
silence the grassroots movement that saw increased momentum after the 2010
midterm elections.
“Mitch McConnell’s campaign rider is a blatant attempt to
give himself a political advantage over the grassroots who are disgusted with
his leadership and want to elect new leaders to the Senate. McConnell and his
cronies don’t like being held accountable so he wants to rewrite the law to
help him crush conservative candidates,” he said. Cuccinelli continued:
"McConnell claims that he’s pushing this rider to
expand freedom of speech, but it only expands speech for establishment Republicans
while Americans who want to change Washington get absolutely nothing."
McConnell’s office did not immediately respond to a
request for comment.
(*SMIRK*)
According to the Federal Election Commission, political
parties can currently spend $48,000 in coordination with House candidates and
up to $20 million for presidential nominees.
Should McConnell’s policy rider pass, parties would be
permitted to spend unlimited amounts in coordination with candidates.
Congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle have
used massive spending bills as a vehicle for campaign finance policy riders in
the past.
Last year, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and
former House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, added a measure into a spending bill
that raised the amount an individual could contribute to between $97,200 and
$777,600 to party committees.
The contributions, though, are restricted to accounts for
legal proceedings and party headquarters buildings, according to the Federal
Election Commission.
* ENRICH THE ESTABLISHMENT LAW FIRMS AND LAWYERS (WHO OF
COURSE "KICK BACK" PART OF THE WINDFALL IN THE FORM OF ADDITIONAL
CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS) WHILE SUPPRESSING THE GRASS ROOTS "REGULAR
FOLKS" WHO CAN'T AFFORD TO GO TO COURT AGAINST HIGH PRICED WASHINGTON/NYC/CHICAGO/LA
LAW FIRMS.
(*JUST SHAKING MY HEAD*)
No comments:
Post a Comment