Thursday, November 1, 2012

Barker's Newsbites: November 1, 2012


And the headline from today's Daily News...

Looters Target Coney Island After Sandy Sweeps Through

Fucking animals.

In broad daylight, thieves stole flat screens from Rent-A-Center. Others swiped top shelf booze from Joann’s Discount Wine and Liquors.

The thieves started down Mermaid Avenue Tuesday morning as the chest-high water receded, turning the seaside community known for its hotdogs and tourist attractions into a lawless free-for-all.

[The] wave a looters followed the Sandy storm surge in Coney Island, creating a double-whammy for business owners trying to pick up the obliterated pieces. "People were running in and out of Rent-A-Center carrying these big flat screens. They were holding on tight," said witness Aisha John, 20. "I couldn't understand how someone could steal a big TV in broad daylight, but no one cared.”

She said people were running out of a nearby Rite Aid with bags of diapers and wipes.

Not "people." Animals.


"Look, they've been looting our wallets for too long," said a young male who claimed he helped himself to a TV at the Rent-A-Center.

A young white male...? (Why am I guessing not...)


“It's about time we start taking this shit back," the youth, who identified himself as Jesse James, told the Daily News.

"Jesse James" needs a bullet in his head. Understand folks... the cops aren't gonna help you if the animals get to your neighborhood. Government isn't going to save you or your family.

"It was complete lawlessness,” said Ron Troyano, owner of Joann’s Discount Wine and Liquors on Mermaid Ave. He said looters used tools to bust through his steel security gates around 11:30 a.m. Tuesday.


Ron should have been prepared for this. Indeed, we should all be prepared to deal with these animals.


The thieves then shattered his storefront and helped themselves to thousands of dollars worth of top shelf liquor, he said.

He should have been prepared. He should have been armed. He should have protected his store and by doing so helped to protect civilization itself.


"They pried open the gate, broke the glass and went straight for the Hennessy and Grey Goose,” he said.

You can't pry open a gate with a bullet in your brain.

Police got a measure of control around 4 p.m. Tuesday, but two cops positioned outside Joann’s into the night failed to stop more looters from sneaking in through the roof, Troyano told The News.

 Nice...

"They broke right in through the roof while the cops were standing outside. It's unbelievable. They were passing bottles down to each other from the roof," he said.

Were these cops instructed not to interfere... not to use force to protect property? If not... then have they been suspended pending dismissal for gross incompetence?

Troyano said between the flooding and the plundering, his losses were too high to easily calculate. He said he’s not sure when he’ll re-open."We are supposed to come together as a community during times of crisis, not pick at each other like vultures," he said. "Next time I'm getting a gun."

Yep. (The only thing is... will County/City/State government allow him to exercise his Constitutional Rights...?)

Looters also hit The Fresh Market five blocks down. "They destroyed everything. They stole anything they could get their hands on. Someone even ran off with the cash register," said employee Fernando Mendoza as he picked up pieces of broken glass Wednesday.

"It was a mob of people. Fifty to a hundred. They were just running down the street grabbing anything that wasn't nailed down," he said.

And you people don't think America is in deep decline? Can you imagine how much looting there's been that the authorities have covered up - with the cooperation of the liberal media?

"They were literally walking out with shopping carts full of merchandise. They didn't even look worried,” a Rite Aid employee who declined to give her name told The News. They looked like they were casually shopping," she said. "They looked almost happy. I saw an elderly lady walking away with batteries and a bag of Kit Kats.”

Again, people... there's a thin - and ever-growing thinner - veneer of civilization protecting honest citizens from the predators amongst us. And there are literally millions of predators and would-be predators out there folks... just waiting... waiting for their opportunity to strike.


6 comments:

William R. Barker said...

http://news.yahoo.com/york-governor-ask-federal-government-cover-sandy-storm-200420294.html;_ylt=A2KJ3CaGXJJQjHEAdIbQtDMD

New York state on Wednesday asked the U.S. federal government to pay all the costs of cleaning up and repairing damage from massive storm Sandy that tore through the Northeast this week and crippled New York City.

* I AM TOTALLY OPPOSED TO THIS. THOSE WHO WERE PROPERLY INSURED SHOULD GET WHAT THEY HAVE COMING TO THEM AND AS FOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPENSES AND LOSSES (GOVERNMENT LARGELY SELF-INSURES) IT SEEMS TO ME THAT FEDERAL ASSISTANCE SHOULD EXTEND NO HIGHER THAN PARTNERING WITH INDIVIDUAL STATES - 50%-50%.

Governor Andrew Cuomo said he is asking fellow Democrat, President Barack Obama, to pay 100% of the estimated $6 billion bill... ... That would be a significant change from last year when the federal government covered about 75% of the $1.2 billion cost paid by New York to clean up after storm Irene hit the region.

* AGAIN... I'M THINKING A 50%-50% SPLIT - AT MOST - IS REASONABLE.

The two U.S. senators from neighboring New Jersey, Frank Lautenberg and Robert Menendez, both Democrats...also asked that the federal government cover more than the usual share of the costs...

* OF COURSE THEY DID...

New York top finance official, Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, said Washington should foot the bill...[saying]..."They can print money..."

* FOLKS... THIS IS WHAT WE'RE DEALING WITH!

[I]t is up to Obama to decide if federal funds can cover all the costs. "The president has the discretion to go higher. Seventy-five percent is a floor not a ceiling," said Matt Mayer, a former senior official at the Department of Homeland Security.

* AND WHEN DID CONGRESS GIVE THE PRESIDENT SUCH AUTHORITY? AND EVEN IF THEY HAVE... BY WHAT CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE MAY CONGRESS SIMPLY "DELEGATE" ITS FUNDAMENTAL "POWER OF THE PURSE?"

* FOLKS... UNDERSTAND... AMERICA IS NO LONGER A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC UNDER THE RULE OF LAW.

Former President George W. Bush allowed 100 percent reimbursement of costs in some states after Hurricane Katrina struck in 2005, Mayer, who worked at DHS during Bush's presidency, told Reuters.

* AND HE WAS WRONG TO DO SO! WRONG IS WRONG! IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO THE PRESIDENT IS! IT DOESN'T MATTER WHICH PARTY CONTROLS WHICH BRANCH(ES) OF GOVERNMENT!

New York state is rated AA by Standard and Poor's and Aa2 by Moody's and its outstanding debt is the second highest among states, after California.

* AND SO... (*SCRATCHING MY HEAD*)... THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD TAKE PITY ON... "REWARD" THE STATE FOR BEING IRRESPONSIBLE...???

William R. Barker said...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/31/two-thirds-of-jobs-go-to-immigrants/#.UJJd2_E9JXQ.mailto

Two-thirds of those who have found employment under President Obama are immigrants, both legal and illegal, according to an analysis [by the Immigration Research Center] that suggests immigration has soaked up a large portion of what little job growth there has been over the past three years.

“It’s extraordinary that most of the employment growth in the last four years has gone to the foreign-born, but what’s even more
extraordinary is the issue has not even come up during a presidential election that is so focused on jobs,” said Steven A. Camarota, the Immigration Research Center's research director, who wrote the report along with demographer Karen Zeigler.

His numbers are stark: Since the first quarter of 2009, the number of immigrants of working age (16 to 65) who are employed has risen 2 million, from 21.2 million to 23.2 million. During the same time, native-born employment has risen just 1 million, to reach 119.9 million.

(*JUST SHAKING MY HEAD*)

In 2000, 76% of native-born Americans aged 18 to 65 were employed, but that dropped steadily to 69% this September.

By contrast, immigrants started the last decade at 71% employment and rose to a peak of 74% at the height of the George W. Bush-era economic boom. (They since have slid down to 69% amid the sluggish economy.)

Mr. Camarota’s numbers show that most of the immigrant employment growth went to new arrivals, not to foreign-born residents already in the United States - a figure that suggests immigrants already settled here were having some of the same difficulties as the native-born Americans.

There is some bright news: an uptick over the past year among native-born Americans accounting for two-thirds of all new employment
growth.

* MEANING... ONE-THIRD OF NEW JOBS ARE GOING TO IMMIGRANTS!

William R. Barker said...

* FOUR-PARTER... (Part 1 of 4)

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/11/the-benghazi-drip-drip-drip/

As he left his Marine One helicopter Wednesday evening and walked to the residence of the White House, President Obama did not respond to a question shouted out by ABC News’s Mary Bruce about when he would begin to provide answers to the numerous questions building up about what exactly what went wrong in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012.

The president smiled and continued walking.

[This latest episode serves to] underline the apparent strategy the president specifically and his administration in general have seemed to adopt when it comes to the myriad inquiries about the decisions that led to the deaths of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens: they are deferring detailed answers to the investigation and – critics say –running out the clock until Election Day.

* AND WHILE THIS ISN'T THE FIRST ABC NEWS JAKE TAPPER PIECE ON WHAT'S BEEN GOING ON, THE SAD TRUTH IS THAT BY AND LARGE THE MSM - INCLUDING ABC NEWS - HAS BEEN PROVIDING COVER FOR OBAMA AND DOWNPLAYING EACH PIECE OF THE PUZZLE AS IT COMES TO LIGHT.

As of now, the White House has disclosed that President Obama was informed about the attack on the diplomatic outpost in Benghazi at roughly 5pm by his National Security Adviser Tom Donilon as he was in a pre-scheduled meeting with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey.

* 5pm WASHINGTON TIME...? 5pm BENGHAZI TIME...? COM'ON... RIGHT HERE WE HAVE AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT I CAN ONLY ASSUME IS DELIBERATE MUDDYING OF THE WATERS TO PROVIDE OBAMA COVER. WHY NOT SPECIFY WHEN THE PRESIDENT KNEW WHAT ACCORDING TO THE ACTUAL TIMELINE OF THE FIRST ATTACK ON THE CONSULATE... HMM...???

At that meeting, senior administration officials say, the President ordered that the U.S. begin moving military assets into the region to prepare for a range of contingencies.

* SEE... RIGHT HERE THE STORY IS CHANGING. GO BACK TO PREVIOUS STAND-ALONE USUALLY RIGHT POSTS AND NEWSBITES. SUPPOSEDLY OBAMA GAVE THE ORDER TO DO WHATEVER NEEDED TO BE DONE TO RESCUE OUR PEOPLE. I FRANKLY DON'T BELIEVE HE ACTUALLY DID GIVE SUCH AN ORDER, BUT IF HE DID THEN THAT ORDER WAS DISOBEYED AND AS YET NO ONE HAS LOST HIS OR HER JOB... LET ALONE BEEN ARRESTED FOR DISOBEYING A (SUPPOSEDLY) DIRECT PRESIDENTIAL ORDER.

* TO BE CONTINUED...

William R. Barker said...

* CONTINUING... (*Part 2 of 4)

But beyond that, the White House has punted, saying the Accountability Review Board established by the State Department is investigating the matter and what went wrong. No detailed tick-tock, no information about the president’s involvement in decision-making.

* RUNNING OUT THE CLOCK... DISGUSTING.

In addition, they’re preparing for a closed-door hearing of the Senate’s Select Committee on Intelligence on November 15.

* WEEKS AFTER THE ELECTION. DISGUSTING.

Without question in this hyper-partisan environment, Republicans operatives are fanning flames and creating suspicions where there’s no evidence of wrongdoing, trafficking in false rumors and idle speculation.

* THE NEW YORK TIMES? REUTERS? ABC NEWS ITSELF? FOLKS... I PROVIDE LINKS FOR EVERYTHING I PASS ON TO YOU. THE FACT THAT ABC NEWS WOULD INSERT SUCH A SENTENCE INTO THIS STORY TELLS YOU HOW DESPERATE THEY ARE TO PROVIDE COVER FOR OBAMA WHILE NOT BEING SO BLATANT ABOUT IT AS TO SIMPLY IGNORE THE ALMOST DAILY REVELATIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN COMING OUT.

* FOLKS... THERE ARE CAREER CIVIL SERVANTS IN THE STATE DEPARTMENT, THE PENTAGON, AND EVEN THE CIA WHO ARE SIMPLY NOT WILLING TO COOPERATE WITH THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION'S COVER-UP. THAT'S WHY ALL THIS INFO WE'RE NOW AWARE OF HAS BEEN COMING OUT.

The White House has felt the necessity to pop its head up to shoot down stories it says are false.

* AND THE MSM SIMPLY TAKES THE ADMINISTRATION'S WORD...???

For instance, Tommy Vietor, the spokesman for the National Security Council, has said that despite some claims, there was no real-time video of the attack being watched in the Situation Room.

* AND HAS THIS CLAIM BEEN VETTED? ARE THEY BEING STRAIGHT OR PLAYING WORD GAMES? WAS THERE VIDEO ON A DELAY? WAS VIDEO WATCHED BY THE PRESIDENT ELSEWHERE THAN THE SITUATION ROOM?

* TO BE CONTINUED...

William R. Barker said...

* CONTINUING... (Part 3 of 4)

As for recent stories suggesting otherwise, Vietor says, “the White House didn’t deny any requests for assistance. Period.

* THEN... WHO... DID...?

Moreover, what the entire government did – the White House, State Department, Intelligence Community, Department of Defense included – was to work to mobilize all available assets and move them into the region as quickly as possible. That’s what the President ordered the Secretary of Defense and Chairman to do the first time he was briefed about these issues.

* ANYONE WHO HAS BEEN FOLLOWING THIS STORY HERE AT USUALLY RIGHT KNOWS THAT THIS ISN'T THE STORY WE'VE BEEN GETTING. NOTICE HOW ABC JUST THROWS OUT THE ADMINISTRATION'S CLAIMS AND DOESN'T EVEN ATTEMPT TO PROVIDE VERIFICATION OR INDEPENDENTLY KNOCK DOWN PREVIOUS CONTRADICTORY INFORMATION UNDERCUTTING THE LATEST ADMINISTRATION SPIN.

Many of those assets were later used to reinforce embassies in places like Yemen, Libya and Egypt.

* FOUR... AMERICANS... KILLED...

* INCLUDING... OUR... AMBASSADOR...

* ATTACKS THAT RAGED OVER MANY HOURS...

* CIA ASSETS IN BENGHAZI ORDER BY 'SOMEONE" TO STAND DOWN AND NOT ATTEMPT RESCUE...

* MILITARY ASSETS WITHIN AN HOUR'S OR TWO HOUR'S HELICOPTER RIDE NOT SENT IMMEDIATELY TO TRY AND RESCUE THE AMBASSADOR AND THE SEALS...

* FOLKS... IF YOU HAVE TO GO ALL THE WAY BACK TO 9/11/12 AND RE-READ EVERY POST AND NEWSBITE I'VE POSTED!

But that doesn’t mean the myriad questions stacking up are all political in nature, nor that those interested in answers about the Benghazi tragedy are motivated by partisan and nefarious aims.

The Washington Post’s respected foreign policy columnist David Ignatius just yesterday posed “Lingering Questions about Benghazi.” One of them, pointedly, was “At a time when al-Qaeda was strengthening its presence in Libya and across North Africa, why didn’t the United States have more military hardware nearby?”

* FOLKS... THE U.S. DID HAVE ASSETS NEARBY! THEY WEREN'T ALLOWED TO IMMEDIATELY RUSH TO THE RESCUE!

In the place of a detailed description from the Obama administration about what happened more than six weeks ago comes the drip-drip-drip of stories about the failures of the Obama administration to provide those Americans on the ground in Libya with all the security assets they needed.

ABC News broke some stories on this, ranging from a security team being denied continued use of an airplane its commander wanted to keep in country to better do his job; to the security team leaving Libya before Ambassador Stevens wanted it to.

* FOLKS... ABC IS NOW MAKING MY CASE!

* TO BE CONTINUED...

William R. Barker said...

* CONCLUDING... (Part 4 of 4)

Fox News Channel’s Catherine Herridge last night reported on a newly discovered cable indicating that in August, less than a month before the attack, the diplomatic post in Benghazi convened an “emergency meeting” concerned about local Al Qaeda training camps. Said the cable: “RSO (Regional Security Officer) expressed concerns with the ability to defend Post in the event of a coordinated attack due to limited manpower, security measures, weapons capabilities, host nation support, and the overall size of the compound.”

The cable stated that “In light of the uncertain security environment, US Mission Benghazi will submit specific requests to US Embassy Tripoli for additional physical security upgrades and staffing needs by separate cover.”

* AGAIN... YES...!

This afternoon, journalists Harald Doornbos and Jenan Moussa in Foreign Policy Magazine reported that when they arrived at the compound in Benghazi on October 26 they found “several ash-strewn documents beneath rubble in the looted Tactical Operations Center, one of the four main buildings of the partially destroyed compound. Some of the documents — such as an email from Stevens to his political officer in Benghazi and a flight itinerary sent to Sean Smith, a U.S. diplomat slain in the attack — are clearly marked as State Department correspondence. Others are unsigned printouts of messages to local and national Libyan authorities. The two unsigned draft letters are both dated Sept. 11 and express strong fears about the security situation at the compound on what would turn out to be a tragic day. They also indicate that Stevens and his team had officially requested additional security at the Benghazi compound for his visit — and that they apparently did not feel it was being provided.”

* IS THIS A STRANGE STORY OR WHAT? IT'S LIKE ABC ASSIGNED A "REAL" REPORTER TO WRITE IT AND THEN INSISTED AN OBAMA REPRESENTATIVE ACT AS CO-WRITER/EDITOR. ABC NEWS SEEMS TO BE TALKING OUT OF BOTH SIDES OF THEIR MOUTH!

A Sept. 11 missive to the head of the Libyan Ministry of Foreign Affairs notes that on that morning, “one of our diligent guards made a troubling report. Near our main gate, a member of the police force was seen in the upper level of a building across from our compound. It is reported that this person was photographing the inside of the U.S. special mission and furthermore that this person was part of the police unit sent to protect the mission. The police car stationed where this event occurred was number 322.”

On Air Force One today, White House press secretary Jay Carney was asked by ABC News how closely the President is reading and following the media reports about what went wrong in Benghazi. “Is he engaged in the investigation and receiving updates on the investigation, or is he waiting until it’s complete?” ABC News’ Devin Dwyer asked.

Carney noted that since the “investigations are being conducted by both the FBI and the Accountability Review Board” the president himself “is not participating in the investigation.

* BUT APPARENTLY HE'S PARTICIPATING IN THE COVER-UP... THE ATTEMPTED COVER-UP THAT IS... THE ATTEMPTED COVER-UP THAT IS NOW IN TATTERS THAT IS...

The White House press secretary – who has not held a full-fledged briefing with the White House press corps since October 12 – said that the president “expects the investigations to be rigorous. He is extremely focused on making sure that we find exactly what happened and who was responsible, and tracking down those who were responsible and bringing them to justice.”

* LET'S HOPE AND PRAY THAT OBAMA FACES THE "JUSTICE" OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLES' JUDGMENT NEXT TUESDAY!