Could it happen again?
That is the taboo question on the 20th anniversary of Los
Angeles’s murderous Rodney King riots, just as another racially charged prosecution
— this time in Florida — captures headlines across the nation.
Sadly, the answer is yes.
As the Oakland riots in 2009 and 2010 following a transit
officer’s fatal shooting of a parolee made clear, the threat of riots — what
Fred Siegel has called “riot ideology” — still hangs over interracial incidents
of violence when the "victim" is black.
And just as the press cynically manipulated the facts in
the Rodney King beating in order to increase racial tensions, it has done so
again in the Trayvon Martin shooting in Sanford, Florida.
The best hope for avoiding a repeat of the L.A. mayhem,
should blacks not be satisfied with the verdict in the Trayvon Martin case, is
that police forces across the country have learned the lesson of the Rodney
King riots: that outbreaks of civil anarchy must be immediately and
unapologetically suppressed.
* HEAR! HEAR!
* AND LET ME ADD, WHILE THE AUTHOR IS REFERRING TO A
SPECIFIC SITUATION WHERE USING THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE OF "...SHOULD BLACKS
NOT BE SATISFIED..." IS TOTALLY APPROPRIATE, I BELIEVE HER POSITION IS THE
SAME AS MINE, NAMELY, RIOTING - REGARDLESS OF WHO THE RIOTERS ARE - MUST NOT BE
TOLERATED.
Anniversary coverage of the 1992 riots (or, as the New
York Times is still willing to put it, “civil unrest”) has whitewashed the
violence and imposed a predictable storyline: that the riots were caused by the
Los Angeles Police Department, not by the individuals who viciously assaulted
motorists and shot Korean store owners.
* FRIGGIN' NYT... (*JUST SHAKING MY HEAD*)
True, the LAPD had a troubled history with blacks in
South Central Los Angeles. But the Rodney King beating was not a function of
that history. In the 1950s and 1960s, LAPD Chief William Parker responded to
the perennial problem of L.A. policing — too few cops, too much ground to cover
— by cultivating an imperious command-and-control attitude in officers that
sometimes merged into outright racism in the city’s high crime black areas. But
by the 1980s, despite Parker’s earlier efforts to insulate the department from
political interference, it was anti-cop politics, not the Centurion ideal, that
most shaped the LAPD.
The department lowered physical standards to meet hiring
quotas for females and minorities; those lowered standards increased the risk
that officers would resort to firearms and other instruments of lethal force to
subdue recalcitrant suspects. A ban on the use of the choke-hold likewise made
use of the baton more likely. The Rodney King beating was the outgrowth of
these political pressures.
Pumped up on alcohol and drugs, King led officers on a
high-speed chase across L.A.’s freeways and residential streets far north of
South Central. When the officers finally stopped him, they tried non-violent
means of arresting him — verbal commands, a group tackle, handcuffs, and,
finally, a taser — but he fiercely fought all of them off.
Only after King lunged at the officers did they resort to
the baton.
A civilian video captured much of the stop, but... the media
edited out the nonviolent prelude to the baton blows.
The loop beamed around the world thousands of times
appeared to show an unprovoked beating of King, agonizingly prolonged because
the main protagonist, the diminutive Laurence Powell, was physically over-matched
by King and incompetent in use of the baton. (King’s two passengers, by
comparison, complied with the officers’ orders and were arrested without
incident.)
Unlike most of the public, the jury that decided the
excessive-force charges against the officers saw the full video.
They acquitted the officers.
By then, the media had disseminated the relentless
message that the biggest threat facing blacks in L.A. was the cops, not the
hundreds of gangs that murdered blacks every week with zero protest from racial
advocates. The verdict itself, according to the advocates and their press
allies, could only have been produced by a criminal-justice system stacked
against blacks.
(*SADLY SHAKING MY HEAD*)
* FOLKS... AGAIN... GENERAL COMMENT: THIS IS WHY YOU NEED
TO READ NEWSBITES. THE MEDIA - EVEN THE SO-CALLED "CONSERVATIVE"
MEDIA - LIES AND DISTORTS REALITY SO OFTEN THAT UNLESS ONE HAS THE SORT OF
KNOWLEDGE BASE I DO IT'S ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE NOT TO GET SUCKED IN AT TIMES. THIS
ISN'T EGO TALKING; THIS IS FACT!
COM'ON... HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU LEARNED SOMETHING YOU ORDINARILY
WOULDN'T HAVE VIA NEWSBITES?! AND NOTICE, FOLKS, MY CRITIQUES AREN'T LIMITED TO
DEMOCRATS AND LIBERALS. NO. I SLAM THE REPUBLICANS CONSTANTLY! I SLAM
"CONSERVATIVES" CONSTANTLY! IT'S CALLED "INTEGRITY" AND
UNFORTUNATELY... FEW IN THE MEDIA POSSESS IT.
Fifty-four dead, 2,328 hospitalizations, nearly $1
billion in property damage. Twenty years later, the media seems interested
mainly in asking how Rodney King feels about things now and whether the LAPD
has changed. The suggestion that individuals were accountable for the violence
is absent, and the clear implication in the coverage is that society had it
coming. No reporter or commentator has asked: what collapse of socialization
could lead to such nihilistic violence? Or: Has anything improved in the black
family or black culture to guard against such depravity in the future?
(*SIGH*)
The press could use the 1992 riots as an occasion for
self-examination. Instead, history is repeating itself. The build-up around the
Trayvon Martin shooting seems almost designed to provoke riots should the case
not come out the way the race agitators and the media think it should.
(*NOD*)
As with the King beating, the press has doctored evidence
and suppressed relevant context.
[They are] once again promoting falsehoods — that
the criminal justice system is racist and that blacks are under assault from
racist whites. (To the contrary, young black males are under assault from other
young blacks, who commit homicide at ten times the rate of young white and
Hispanic males combined. White-on-black killings are negligible compared with
black-on-white killings and are a minute fraction of the over 6,000 blacks
mowed down every year by other blacks. Blacks kill whites and Hispanics at
two-and-a-half times the rate at which whites and Hispanics kill blacks, though
blacks are only one-sixth of the combined white and Hispanic population.)
(*SHRUG*)
It seems almost unimaginable that a jury would acquit
Zimmerman after the intense campaign insisting on the symbolic racial status of
the case. But should such an outcome come to pass, every police department in
the country should be prepared to put down any ensuing violence at its first
outbreak, in the name of justice for all. This much we should all have learned
from the ugliness of 1992.
2 comments:
* TWO-PARTER... (Part 1 of 2)
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/297172/racism-and-george-zimmerman-thomas-sowell
* BY THOMAS SOWELL
Whatever the ultimate outcome of the case against George Zimmerman for his shooting of Trayvon Martin, what has happened already is enough to turn the stomach of anyone who believes in either truth or justice.
An amazing proportion of the media has given us a painful demonstration of the thinking — and lack of thinking — that prevailed back in the days of the old Jim Crow South, where complexion counted more than facts in determining how people were treated.
One of the first things presented in the media was a transcript of a conversation between George Zimmerman and a police dispatcher. The last line in most of the transcripts shown on TV was that of the police dispatcher telling Zimmerman not to continue following Trayvon Martin.
That became the basis of many media criticisms of Zimmerman for continuing to follow him. Only later did I see a transcript of that conversation on the Sean Hannity program that included Zimmerman’s reply to the police dispatcher: “Okay.”
That reply removed the only basis for assuming that Zimmerman did in fact continue to follow Trayvon Martin.
At this point, neither I nor the people who assumed that he continued to follow the teenager have any basis in fact for believing that he did or didn’t.
Why was that reply edited out by so many in the media?
* THE ANSWER - SAD AND PATHETIC AS IT MAY BE:
Because too many people in the media see their role as filtering and slanting the news to fit their own vision of the world.
(*PENSIVE NOD*)
The issue is not one of being “fair” to “both sides” but, more fundamentally, of being honest with their audience.
(*SIGH*)
* TO BE CONTINUED...
* CONCLUDING... (Part 2 of 2)
NBC News carried the editing even further, removing one of the police dispatcher’s questions (to which Zimmerman was responding) in order to feed the vision of Zimmerman as a racist.
* IN A SANE WORLD THE PERSON - OR PERSONS - RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT VILE ACT WOULD BE TRIED, CONVICTED, AND JAILED.
In the same vein were the repeated references to Zimmerman as a “white Hispanic.”
(*SNORT*)
Zimmerman is half-white.
So is Barack Obama.
But does anyone refer to Obama as a “white African”?
(*LAUGHING MY ASS OFF*)
All these verbal games grow out of the notion that complexion tells you who is to be blamed and who is not. It is a dangerous game because race is no game. If the tragic history of the old Jim Crow South in this country is not enough to show that, the history of racial and ethnic tragedies is written in blood in countries around the world. Millions have lost their lives because they looked different, talked differently, or belonged to a different religion.
In the midst of the Florida tragedy, there was a book published with the unwieldy title, "No Matter What . . . They’ll Call This Book Racist". Obviously it was written well before the shooting in Florida, but its message — that there is rampant hypocrisy and irrationality in public discussions of race — could not have been better timed.
(*NOD*)
Author Harry Stein, a self-described “reformed white liberal,” raised by parents who were even further to the Left, exposes the illogic and outright fraudulence that lies behind so much of what is said about race in the media, in politics, and in our educational institutions.
He asks a very fundamental question: “Why, even after the Duke University rape fiasco, does the media continue to give credence to every charge of racism?”
* GOOD FRIGGIN' QUESTION, HUH...?!?!
Harry Stein credits Shelby Steele’s book "White Guilt" with opening his eyes to one of the sources of many counter-productive things said and done about race today — namely, guilt about what was done to blacks and other minorities in the past.
Let us talk sense, like adults. Nothing that is done to George Zimmerman — justly or unjustly — will unlynch a single black man who was tortured and killed in the Jim Crow South for a crime he didn’t commit.
Letting hoodlums get away with hoodlumism today does not undo a single injustice of the past. It is not even a favor to the hoodlums, for many of whom this is just the first step on a path that leads to the penitentiary, and maybe to the execution chamber.
Winston Churchill said, “If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost.” He wasn’t talking about racial issues, but what he said applies especially where race is involved.
Post a Comment