Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Barker's Newsbites: Wednesday, April 25, 2012


Getting excited...!!!

Oh, yeah... T-3!

Another Leiter wedding!

Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy!
 

9 comments:

William R. Barker said...

http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/25/rural-kids-parents-angry-about-labor-dept-rule-banning-farm-chores/

[Obama's] Department of Labor is poised to put the finishing touches on a rule that would apply child-labor laws to children working on family farms, prohibiting them from performing a list of jobs on their own families’ land.

Under the rules, children under 18 could no longer work “in the storing, marketing and transporting of farm product raw materials.”

“Prohibited places of employment,” a Department press release read, “would include country grain elevators, grain bins, silos, feed lots, stockyards, livestock exchanges and livestock auctions.”

The new regulations, first proposed August 31 by Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, would also revoke the government’s approval of safety training and certification taught by independent groups like 4-H and FFA, replacing them instead with a 90-hour federal government training course.

* OBAMA'S GOAL: TO FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE AMERICA.

(*PURSED LIPS*)

* PERHAPS THE FEDS SHOULD CONCENTRATE ON TRAINING THE SECRET SERVICE NOT TO ENGAGE HOOKERS AND TEACH THE GAO HOW NOT TO PAD THEIR EXPENSE REPORTS. JEEZUS... WE'VE GOTTA GET THIS BASTARD OUT OF OFFICE, PEOPLE!

William R. Barker said...

http://freebeacon.com/obamas-swiss-banker/

One of President Obama’s largest financial backers is a key executive at the largest Swiss bank in the world...

(*PURSED LIPS*)

Robert Wolf is president of Swiss financial giant UBS Investment Bank and chairman of UBS Americas. He has been one of Obama’s most prolific fundraisers dating back to 2006, when the former Senator from Illinois initiated his run for the White House. Wolf has bundled more than $500,000 for the president’s reelection, campaign records show.

He is but one of many wealthy bankers Obama has turned to in an effort to win a second term.

(*SIGH*)

According to campaign reporter John Heilemann, Obama and Wolf first met in December 2006 in a conference room owned by liberal billionaire George Soros...

(*SNORT*)

Wolf’s company, UBS, gave an additional $532,000, making it the 15th largest contributor to Obama’s first presidential run.

* I FORGET WHERE GOLD-MAN SACHS RANKS... (*SMIRK*)

Upon taking office in early 2009, Obama appointed Wolf to the Economic Recovery Advisory Board that would help craft the controversial $787 billion stimulus package.

Shortly after Wolf was appointed, UBS admitted to conspiring to defraud the Internal Revenue Service and agreed to pay $780 million to ward off a federal investigation into its activities.

* FOLKS... (*SIGH*)... YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS STUFF UP!

Wolf was also one of several major Democratic donors named to the President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.

* YEAH... THAT'S THE ONE CHAIRED BY OBAMA'S OTHER BUDDY - GE CHAIRMAN JEFF IMMELT. (*SMIRK*)

Last month, Wolf hosted a $35,800-per-plate fundraiser for the president in New York City.

* HOPE... CHANGE... HOPE... CHANGE...

Another Obama bundler, Charles Adams, also has a Swiss address, as Buzzfeed noted earlier this year; he “heads the office of the law firm Akin Gump in the Swiss capital. Adams raised more than $100,000 for Obama, according to the report.”

(*JUST SHAKING MY HEAD*)

[T]here has been little criticism from Democrats and the media establishment of the president’s dealings with Wolf. That is a marked departure from the 2008 campaign, during which critics pilloried GOP nominee John McCain for employing former Texas Senator and UBS executive Phil Gramm as an adviser.

(*SMIRK*)

The president’s effort to blame the nation’s economic woes on abstract forces such as income inequality and the shady machinations of Wall Street bankers has been undercut by controversial campaign decisions — for example, his reversal on anonymous Super PACs, which he once called “a threat to our democracy” — as well as his increasing reliance on campaign bundlers like Wolf and disgraced Wall Street tycoon Jon Corzine.

Obama, who has aggressively sought out support from the super rich, including a number of high-profile celebrities, has already far outpaced his predecessor George W. Bush with respect to the number of fundraisers attended during his first term.

* HIS ATTENDANCE AT THESE FUNDRAISERS "BUNDLED" WITH "OFFICIAL" TRAVEL SO THAT THE TAXPAYERS PICK UP THE TAB.

William R. Barker said...

http://bostonherald.com/news/politics/view/20220424brown_camp_scolds_warren_over_interest-free_loan/

U.S. Sen. Scott Brown’s campaign is blasting Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren’s financial history as... Warren disclosed the 20-year interest free loan from Harvard, which lent her between $15,000 and $50,000 in 1996.

* WOW...!

Warren’s campaign did not have an immediate response, but Marc Landy, a political science professor at Boston College, said perks like interest free loans are common when universities are trying to woo strong talent.

(*SMIRK*)

* SO... FOLKS... HAVE ANY OF YOU EVER BEEN OFFERED A $50,000 INTEREST FREE LOAN BY A PERSPECTIVE EMPLOYER...? HMM...??? OH... AND UNLIKE A SIGNING BONUS, WOULDN'T SUCH A "LOAN" BE TAX-FREE...? HMM...? SOUNDS LIKE A SCAM TO AVOID PAYING ONE'S "FAIR SHARE" TO ME.

Brown’s campaign also pointed out that tuition has increased by at least $16,000 at the Ivy League university since 1996, when Warren’s loan was granted. She also earned a $350,000 salary from the University last year, according to her disclosure forms.

* $350,000... WHY... THAT'S MICHELLE OBAMA MONEY! (WELL... ONCE HER HUSBAND BECAME A U.S. SENATOR AT LEAST...)

(*SNORT*)

* FOLKS... IN ALL SERIOUSNESS... THESE PEOPLE ARE SCUM. THEY'RE PLAYING US! THIS IS THE OLIGARCHY!

* BTW... DID WARREN EVER REPAY THE LOAN...??? (THE STORY DOESN'T SAY!)

William R. Barker said...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303459004577363973852918742.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTSecond

Former presidential candidate Rick Santorum warned that Mitt Romney might not present a "clear contrast" to President Obama in the general election. Judging by Monday's action on the campaign trail, Mr. Santorum had a point.

(*SMIRK*) (*SIGH*) (*JUST SHAKING MY HEAD*)

On a day when the White House urged Congress to increase student-loan subsidies, Mr. Romney had an opportunity to draw a sharp distinction between the expanding Obama entitlement state and a plan to revive the private economy.

(*DRUM ROLL*)

But instead of laying out plans to create jobs and reduce government spending, the former Massachusetts governor arrived at the same policy conclusion as Barack Obama.

(*PUTTING THE BARRELL OF THE GUN INTO MY MOUTH*)

"I encourage Congress to temporarily extend the current low rate on subsidized undergraduate Stafford loans."

* REMEMBER WHEN THE "CONSERVATIVE" MEDIA WERE ATTACKING GINGRICH AND SANTORUM FOR SUPPOSEDLY BETRAYING FREE MARKET ECONOMICS...?

(*SIGH*)

[True conservatives] who have been opposing the extension know it is anything but responsible.

The Obama-Romney subsidy will keep rates as low as 3.4% for many student borrowers, not that far above the 3.1% rate that the Treasury pays to borrow for the long term.

If interest rates spike, taxpayers could be losing on every single new loan, never mind the cost of defaults.

* NOT TO MENTION... (*SIGH*)... SUCH WRONGHEADED, ILL-CONCEIVED, AND FRANKLY COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE SOCIAL ENGINEERING VIA ARTIFICIAL SUBSIDY ENSURES THE CONTINUED - AND NO DOUBT ACCELERATED - MISALLOCATION OF FUNDS TOWARDS AN INFERIOR PRODUCT.

* IN OTHER WORDS, FOLKS, THIS POLICY SPURS EDUCATIONAL INFLATION WHILE DOING NOTHING TO ADDRESS THE REAL ISSUE - NAMELY, THAT FOR DECADES NOW WE'VE BEEN SPENDING MORE AND YET GETTING LESS REAL EDUCATION FOR OUR DOLLARS!

* ROMNEY IS TRULY AN UNPRINCIPLED PANDERING FOOL. IS HE BETTER THAN OBAMA? YES. WILL I VOTE FOR HIM AGAINST OBAMA? YES. BUT GOD HELP THIS NATION. THE REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHMENT BY FORCING THIS MAN UPON US HAS IN ALL PROBABILITY DESTROYED ANY CHANCE WE HAD OF REVERSING COURSE AND SAVING THIS ONCE GREAT NATION.

William R. Barker said...

http://news.investors.com/article/609042/201204241902/gaia-theorist-admits-errors-on-climate-change.htm

Not many years ago, a celebrated scientist predicted a global warming disaster awaited humanity.

Today, that same scientist admits his warning was too "alarmist."

(*SMIRK*)

James Lovelock, father of the "Gaia" theory...was one of the many voices that's predicted environmental calamity will result from carbon dioxide emissions.

He claimed in 2006 that "before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable."

(*ROLLING MY EYES*)

But he has told MSNBC that he overstated the case and now acknowledges that "we don't know what the climate is doing."

(*CLAP-CLAP-CLAP*)

* BETTER LATE THAN NEVER, RIGHT?

(*RUEFUL CHUCKLE*)

"We thought we knew 20 years ago," he said. "That led to some alarmist books — mine included — because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn't happened."

* YEP... GIVE THE GUY CREDIT!

The 92-year-old Lovelock notes that "the climate is doing its usual tricks" and concedes "there's nothing much really happening yet" even though "we were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now."

Lovelock hasn't fully changed course yet. MSNBC says he still believes climate change is occurring, though not as rapidly as he once thought.

"The world has not warmed up very much since the millennium. Twelve years is a reasonable time," he said. Yet the temperature "has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been rising — carbon dioxide is rising, no question about that."

Researchers can theorize that an increase in human-caused CO2 emissions will heat the planet, but they haven't been able to prove it. There are too many forces outside of man that influence temperature, precipitation, clouds, humidity and wind. Rather than continuing to contend that man is driving temperatures to dangerous levels, it seems that is the explanation that Lovelock is moving toward, though apparently quite slowly.

But give the independent scientist credit for admitting his mistake as well as pointing out that a university or government researcher might not be so inclined to admit error due to fear he would lose funding for bucking the alarmist narrative.

His honesty in the midst of an issue so shrouded in deceit is refreshing.

(*NOD*)

William R. Barker said...

* TWO-PARTER... (Part 1 of 2)

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/04/25/stealing-our-elections

Columnist David Limbaugh, brother of Rush, asks in a recent column, "Can anyone think of an innocuous reason that President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder oppose state voter ID laws?"

The correct answer is definitely "no!"

But even Limbaugh dances around the full answer to the question...

Let's be fully frank. It's not just Obama and Holder, true... it's the whole Democrat party. And the transparent reason they oppose Voter ID, and favor loose election laws like Motor Voter, election day registration, mail in registration, online voting, and extended voting over days and even weeks before Election Day is that vote fraud is a central Democrat strategy for "winning" elections.

(*SHRUG*) (*NOD*)

The American Civil Rights Union (ACRU) is a legal foundation started by the late Robert B. Carleson...

Today the ACRU serves as a counterpoint to the ACLU, with former Reagan Attorney General Ed Meese and other Reagan Administration alumni or associates serving in the organization, including myself, working as General Counsel since the organization's founding in 1998. The Chairman and President since 2006 is Susan A. Carleson, Robert Carleson's widow.

A new project of the ACRU is "Protect Your Vote!" focused on countering vote fraud. The ACRU project also encourages citizens in every state to get involved in the process to protect their vote by volunteering to be poll watchers, help in voter registration drives, and a multitude of other pre-election and election day efforts.

* TO BE CONTINUED...

William R. Barker said...

* CONCLUDING... (Part 2 of 2)

Why did Attorney General Holder just blow off the Supreme Court in using the authority of the Voting Rights Act to nullify voter ID laws in South Carolina and Texas? Did he find a single voter in either state who had been prevented from voting because of the requirement? If he had, we would all know his or her name by now.

Eric Holder assures us that a vote fraud problem "does not really exist" in the United States. But video guerilla James O'Keefe schooled Holder on the problem. With the video camera rolling, an O'Keefe associate indicated to a D.C. poll worker that he was Eric Holder, provided Holder's address, and asked for a ballot to vote. Handing the ballot to the white O'Keefe associate, the poll worker waived off an offer to show an ID, saying, "As long as you're in here and you're on our list and that's who you say you are, we're OK."

As the Washington Times editorialized on April 17: In April 2011, officials for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) in Nevada pleaded guilty to running an illegal voter-registration scheme. Earlier this month, Democratic Party officials in Indiana were indicted on vote fraud charges for purportedly forging signatures on Barack Obama's 2008 primary petitions. In Virginia, 10 felons were charged with making false statements on voter registration forms."

(Of course, in the early 1990s, President Obama actually ran ACORN's Project Vote in Illinois.)

Early on the morning of June 5, union members in Chicago will be boarding union rented buses to ride to Wisconsin to vote early and often that day for the recall of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker. They will vote in the name of dead people still on the rolls, or those who have moved to other states, or under fraudulently registered names on the rolls through some ACORN-style project.

A February report from the Pew Center on the States found 1.8 million names of dead people still registered to vote on state rolls. Another 2.75 million are registered to vote in more than one state. The study found altogether that 24 million voter registrations, 13% of the nation's total, contained major inaccuracies or were otherwise invalid.

Facilitating that Chicago union Wisconsin project, and similar conduct in swing states this fall, is the real reason Holder opposes voter ID. By his official actions as Attorney General, Holder is running a vote fraud conspiracy right out of the AG's office. And that is being done with [President] Obama's approval.

William R. Barker said...

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/04/25/family-misses-flight-after-tsa-gives-pat-down-to-girl-with-cerebral-palsy/

The TSA is once again the subject of national scrutiny, this time after aggressively screening a 7-year-old female passenger with cerebral palsy which caused her family to miss their flight.

The girl, identified as Dina Frank in a report by The Daily, was waiting with her family on Monday to board a flight departing from JFK headed to Florida.

Since Dina walks with the aid of leg braces and crutches, she cannot pass through airport metal detectors, and must instead submit to a pat-down by TSA agents.

Dina, who is also reportedly developmentally disabled, is usually frightened by the procedure. Her family reportedly requests that agents on hand take the time to introduce themselves to her. However, the agents on duty at the time began to handle her aggressively instead.

Air travel is difficult to the family due to Dina’s disabilities, but the nature of Monday’s inspection was especially traumatic for the child.

“They make our lives completely difficult,” her father, Dr. Joshua Frank, a Long Island pediatrician, told The Daily. “She’s not a threat to national security.”

Frank taped the encounter, which ended when a supervisor inspected her crutches and let them pass. But agents followed up and insisted upon doing a full inspection of Dina.

Ultimately, the family missed their flight.

“They’re harassing people. This is totally misguided policy,” Frank told The Daily. “Yes, I understand that TSA is in charge of national security and there’s all these threats. [But] for her to be singled out, it’s crazy.”

Dina, from Long Island, had recently experienced triumph after Botox and phenol injections helped her to gain control of her legs, enough to take several unassisted steps.

After being born prematurely and suffering from bleeding in the brain, Dina struggled for years to get around, even enduring a double hip replacement to assist in her recovery, CBS New York reported.

* OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN ACTION, FOLKS... (*SIGH*)

* OH... AND HERE'S A SIMILAR REPORT FROM YESTERDAY: http://www.kens5.com/news/local/I-TEAM--Congressman-Canseco-says-TSA-agent-assaulted-him-during-a-pat-down-148756365.html

William R. Barker said...

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/296901/medicare-s-dirty-little-secret-douglas-holtz-eakin

It’s something everyone knows, but no one wants to talk about: Medicare’s cash position makes Enron’s business model look downright reputable.

* WHAT ARE THESE BOZOS BABBLING ABOUT? "EVERYONE KNOWS?" LIKE HELL! I KNOW. MY FAITHFUL READERS KNOW. OUT OF A POPULATION OF 300,000,007 OR SO PERHAPS 10% OF THE POPULATION KNOWS... BUT MOST PEOPLE ARE TOTALLY OBLIVIOUS!

Medicare is bleeding cash — a fact disguised by creative accounting.

* IN OTHER WORDS... LIES. DECEIT. DELIBERATE MANIPULATION OF THE CITIZENRY.

According to Monday’s release of the 2012 Trustees Report, in 2011 Medicare took in $260.8 billion in payroll taxes and beneficiary premiums, but spent $549.1 billion in medical services.

* YEAH. WE CAN DO THE MATH. OVER $260 BILLION (WITH A "B") SHORT.

And 2011 wasn’t the exception; it was the norm. Since President Lyndon Baines Johnson secured passage of Medicare legislation in 1965, the program has run cash deficits every year except 1966 and 1974.

* HMM... WELL... NOW THIS I DIDN'T KNOW!

Advocates of the status quo argue that Medicare receives “general revenue transfers,” but that’s government-speak for raiding the Treasury to spend other tax revenues. It’s the dramatic use of general-revenue transfers that has hidden Medicare’s true insolvency from the public and masked Medicare’s contribution to the national debt.

The annual release of the Medicare Trustees report offers a fleeting moment for adult conversations ... We must take advantage of this year’s moment and come to a bipartisan understanding that the Medicare program needs structural reform and not just nibbling around the edges.

To illustrate why structural reform is needed, consider what it would have taken to have had a positive Medicare cash-flow balance in 2011:

For Medicare Part A (hospitals), the cash deficit was $61 billion. To balance this deficit, payroll taxes on employers and workers would have to have been increased by 31%.

For Medicare Part B (physicians), the cash shortfall was $168 billion. To balance this deficit, seniors’ physician premiums would need to increase by 392%, meaning the annual physician premium cost to seniors would have risen from $1,198 to $4,687 — an increase of $3,499.

For Medicare Part D (drugs), the cash shortfall was over $59 billion. To balance this deficit, seniors’ premiums for prescription drugs would need to increase by 871%, meaning the annual drug-premium cost to seniors would rise from $372 to $3,250 — an increase of $2,878.

* JEEZUS...

President Obama steadfastly defends Medicare’s existing financing structure.

* HE'S AN ASSHOLE.

Since taking office, President Obama has overseen a Medicare cash-flow deficit of more than $869 billion. This includes $570.7 billion in red ink accumulated since the passage of the president’s signature health-care law, which siphoned off $732 billion in Medicare funding over the next ten years.

(By the end of 2012, the trustees project that the Obama administration will have overseen a $1.2 trillion Medicare cash shortfall.)

* AGAIN... JEEZUS...