Friday, April 27, 2012

Barker's Newsbites: Friday, April 27, 2012


All hail the Republicrat/Dempublican oligarchy...

Posted by at

3 comments:

William R. Barker said...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303990604577367881972648906.html

Thirty-five big U.S.-based multinational companies added jobs much faster than other U.S. employers in the past two years...

(*DRUM ROLL*)

* WAIT FOR IT... WAIT FOR IT...

...but nearly three-fourths of those jobs were overseas, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis.

(*SARCASTIC CLAP-CLAP-CLAP*)

April 27, 2012 at 9:00 AM
William R. Barker said...

* TWO-PARTER... (Part 1 of 2)

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=51141

* BY PATRICK J. BUCHANAN

Among the GOP victories in 2010, none was sweeter than that of Marco Rubio.

The charismatic young Cuban-American challenged Gov. Charlie Crist in a Senate primary, ran him out of the party and swept to victory by 19 points in a three-way race.

Among those mentioned as running mates for Mitt Romney, it is Rubio who generates the most excitement. That he is young, Hispanic and conservative, and his place on the ticket might secure Florida, are the cards he brings to the table.

So it was a surprise this week to see Rubio being chaperoned over to the Brookings Institution by Sen. Joe Lieberman to take final vows as the newest neoconservative.

* SORRY, PAT - IT WAS NO SURPRISE TO ME. (*SHRUG*)

John Quincy Adams' declaration that America goes not "abroad in search of monsters to destroy," says Rubio, is an idea that he rejects.

(*SIGH*)

* NOT SURPRISING. RUBIO IS A NEO-CON.

Rubio says that on arrival in the Senate, he was astonished to find conservative colleagues advocating "withdrawal from Afghanistan and staying out of Libya."

* SEE WHAT I MEAN, FOLKS... SEE WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING ABOUT EACH NEW "FLAVOR OF THE MONTH" PORTRAYED AS THE NEXT GREAT CONSERVATIVE HOPE...? RUBIO IS FAR BETTER THAN MOST REPUBLICANS - AS IS PAUL RYAN... AS IS CHRIS CHRISTIE. BUT THIS IS A RELATIVE COMPLIMENT! OVERALL... ALL THREE MEN SHOW THEMSELVES TO BE BIG GOVERNMENT ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS IF ONE LOOKS CLOSELY BEHIND THE CURTAIN.

"I always start," said Rubio, "by reminding people that what happens all over the world is our business. ... The security of our cities is connected to the security of small hamlets in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia."

* JEEZUS...

* TO BE CONTINUED...

April 27, 2012 at 2:21 PM
William R. Barker said...

* CONCLUDING... (Part 2of 2)

Like most neocons, Rubio is fixated on Iran.

"The goal of preventing a dominant Iran is so important that every regional policy we adopt should be crafted with that overriding goal in mind. ... We should also be preparing our allies, and the world, for the reality that ... if all else fails, preventing a nuclear Iran may require a military solution."

But as Iran's neighbor Turkey is more powerful, and there are 300 million Arabs to 75 million Iranians, and one-third of all Iranians are Azeri, Baluch, Arab and Kurd, why is this our problem?

* PERHAPS BECAUSE IF IT COMES TO SHOOTING RUBIO WILL BE SAFE AND SOUND BEHIND HIS DESK IN WASHINGTON...???

(*CYNICAL SMIRK*)

We may have to deal militarily with Syria, too, says Rubio.

(*ROLLING MY EYES*)

Oddly for a man under consideration for vice president, Rubio is positively insulting to Vladimir Putin, who will be leading the world's largest nation and second-largest nuclear power for the next six years.

"Putin might talk tough," says Rubio, "but he knows he is weak. Everywhere he looks, he sees threats to his rule, real and imagined. And so he uses state-owned media to preach paranoia and anti-Western sentiments to Russians."

We should ignore him, says Rubio, and move ahead with "the continued enlargement of NATO."

* JEEZUS... FRIGG'N... CHRIST...

Now, as NATO already encompasses Poland and the Baltic states, what additional nations would Rubio bring in under our nuclear umbrella?

What vital U.S. interest is wrapped up in these regions that most Americans could not find on a map?

Absolutely none.

It is the George W. Bush idea of bringing Ukraine and Georgia into NATO, which would commit us to war with Russia over who owns the Crimean Peninsula and who is sovereign in Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

"Faced with historic deficits and a dangerous national debt, there has been increasing talk of reducing our foreign aid budget," says Rubio.

But Rubio is having none of it.

"Foreign aid is a very cost-effective way not only to export our values, but to advance our security and economic interests."

Yet, with $5 trillion in deficits in one Obama term and a national debt larger than our gross national product, does it make sense to borrow tens of billions annually from China to send to Third World regimes that vote against us and with China in the United Nations?

Is Marco Rubio tomorrow's man. Or is he just an echo of yesterday?

(*SIGH*)

April 27, 2012 at 2:21 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)