“Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall
take the following oath or affirmation — I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I
will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will
to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the
United States.*
(“Unless, you know, 224 years from now, whoever happens
to president simply decides he really doesn’t want to do that.”)
Article II, Section 1, Clause 8 of Barack Obama’s Constitution
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The Founders set the course in a simple, concise, 35-word
affirmation - the president’s top job is to “preserve, protect and defend” the
Constitution.
The chief executive does, of course, have other responsibilities,
but his guardianship of the document they had just written was deemed by the
Founders to be of such great import that they made him swear it - aloud, in
front of witnesses.
In 1884, Congress, having no set oath of office, wrote
its own: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution
of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will
bear true faith and allegiance to the same…”
Little did they know then that 128 years later, America
would face just that: a domestic threat to the U.S. Constitution.
From the very beginning, the President and his
administration made clear they had no intention of enforcing laws they didn’t
like.
Mr. Obama and his minions decided that they would simply stop enforcing
the Defense of Marriage Act, no longer prosecute growers of “medical”
marijuana, and let some states walk away from provisions in the No Child Left
Behind law (which, by the way, was co-authored by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy,
Massachusetts Democrat, and passed the Senate by a 91-8 vote).
Mr. Obama’s Justice Department has even more flagrantly
flouted the laws of the land.
Out of the blue, Attorney General Eric H. Holder
Jr., the nation’s chief law enforcement officer, reinterpreted America’s
gambling laws (and dumped the decision on Christmas Eve so as to avoid
scrutiny). More recently, Mr. Holder has decided to thwart congressional
oversight by refusing to release documents on the disastrous “Fast and Furious”
gun-running scheme, and he is actively fighting Florida for trying to expunge
dead people from its voter rolls.
Now comes Mr. Obama’s decision to stop enforcing
America’s immigration laws.
The new policy states that illegal immigrants who
were younger than 16 when they entered the country are eligible for a two-year
exemption from deportation. Of course, the “deferred action process,” as
Homeland Security Secretary Janet A. Napolitano called it, will apply to
illegals up to age 30. (Think when they legally get their driver’s licenses
they will also be handed a voter registration card?)
The increasingly desperate Mr. Obama, once a
constitutional law professor...
Actually... he was a lecturer, I believe -- BILL
...knows full well he is circumventing Congress. In
March 2011 he told a group of young Hispanics: “America is a nation of laws,
which means I, as the president, am obligated to enforce the law. I don’t have
a choice about that. That’s part of my job."
“Congress passes the law. The executive branch’s job is
to enforce and implement those laws,” he said.
“There are enough laws on the
books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our
immigration system that for me to simply through executive order ignore those
congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as
president.”
So why now?
Politics.
The Hispanic population in Florida,
Virginia, Nevada, New Mexico and Colorado may well decide the November
election, and with working-class whites, religious blacks, disenchanted young
people and Jews fleeing in droves, Mr. Obama is looking to shore up his
support, even if that means violating his oath to protect the Constitution.
Continuing his non-stop campaign of division - black
against white, rich against poor, straight against gay, religious against
secular, race against race - the President is seeking to build whatever loose
coalition of support he can. Forget bipartisanship; a coalition of the middle -
Mr. Obama’s sole path to victory, he thinks - is to stir up so much discontent
within different strata that he can win re-election.
Of course, the liberals who whined about President George
W. Bush’s signing statements haven’t made a peep about Mr. Obama’s Napoleonic
power grab.
“What’s ironic,” columnist Charles Krauthammer noted, “is
for eight years, the Democrats have been screaming about the imperial
presidency with the Bush administration - the nonsense about the unitary
executive. This is out-and-out lawlessness.”
But that doesn’t matter when you are King Barack.
The
Founders were determined to make sure no American leader ever had the power
King George III enjoyed... which is why they also wrote this in the Constitution:
“The president, vice president and all civil officers of the United States,
shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason,
bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
No comments:
Post a Comment