Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Barker's Newsbites: Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Well, folks, this morning's Drudge headline is "Wikileaked: Bin Laden Not Buried at Sea; Body Moved on CIA plane to U.S."
Who knows...?! Maybe it's true, maybe it's not.
I'll be honest with you folks... I still hold out hope that Bin Laden was actually captured and properly interrogated! (That's what should have happened!)
Anyway... if we find out that Obama did indeed lie to us... will anyone be surprised?
(*SHRUG*)
Anyway... today is Super Tuesday.
(*CHUCKLE*)
More media spin.
(Notice the renewed media pronouncements about "Romney having it all sowed up"... regardless of the actual "details"... whether or not he wins Ohio... even if Santorum comes in a close second in Massachusetts...)
Keep tuning in to Usually Right and I'll do my best to give you 1) News you can use; and 2) The truth.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/green-firms-fed-cash-give-execs-bonuses-fail/story?id=15851653#.T1YfE3md6So
President Obama's Department of Energy helped finance several green energy companies that later fell into bankruptcy -- but not before the firms doled out six-figure bonuses and payouts to top executives, a Center for Public Integrity and ABC News investigation found.
* THAT'S OUR BOY, BARRY!
* AND, NO... "BOY" ISN'T A SLUR OR "CODE" FOR A SLUR. (*SMIRK*)
Take, for instance, Beacon Power Corp., the second recipient of an Energy Department loan guarantee in 2009.
In March 2010, the Massachusetts energy storage company paid cash bonuses of $259,285 to three executives... Last October, Beacon Power filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
(*SARCASTIC CLAP-CLAP-CLAP*)
EnerDel, maker of lithium-ion battery systems, landed a $118.5 million energy grant in August 2009.
About one-and-a-half years later, Vice President Joe Biden toured a company plant in Indiana and heralded its taxpayer-supported expansion as one of the "100 Recovery Act Projects That Are Changing America."
Two months after Biden's visit, EnerDel corporate parent Ener1 paid $725,000 in bonuses to three executives -- including $450,000 to then-CEO Charles Gassenheimer, who led Biden on the tour.
(*DRUM ROLL*) WAIT FOR IT... WAIT FOR IT...
This January, Ener1 filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
* GIVE THAT HIGH-HAT A PUMP! (*MORE SARCASTIC CLAPPING*)
At least two other firms that benefited from Energy Department funding - one a $500,000 grant, the other a $535 million loan guarantee - handed out hefty payouts to executives and later went bankrupt.
* HOPE... CHANGE... HOPE... CHANGE... (*SNICKER*)
The Department of Energy, asked about the payments examined by the Center and ABC, said it is troubled by the practice and intends to convey that message to loan recipients.
* WELL THERE YA GO! A "MESSAGE" WILL BE... er... "CONVEYED!"
* O-BAM-A! O-BAM-A! O-BAM-A!
* FOLKS... THIS IS A FOUR PAGE EXPOSE. FEEL FREE TO AVAIL YOURSELVES OF THE LINK I'VE PROVIDED.
* TWO-PARTER... (Part 1 of 2)
http://www.forbes.com/sites/charleskadlec/2012/03/05/tim-geithner-covers-for-corruption-on-pennsylvania-avenue/
Last Friday, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner charged in a Wall Street Journal op-ed that those who oppose the Obama Administration’s regulatory regime for the financial services industry “seem to be suffering from amnesia about how close America came to complete financial collapse under the outdated regulatory system we had before Wall Street reform.”
Au contraire, Secretary Geithner, it is you who choose to ignore and misrepresent the lessons of the financial crisis by perpetuating the myth that the source of the crisis was a lack of regulation.
First, your essay glosses over the central role the federal government played in creating the crisis.
In particular, the government through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac directed $5.2 trillion (that is trillion with a “t”) of capital to increase the supply of mortgages.
In addition, it passed a law that required banks to make billions of dollars in loans to individuals that were unlikely to pay off the loans, in the end with 0% down.
In 1998, Fannie Mae announced it would purchase mortgages with only 3% down.
And, in 2001, it offered a program that required no down payment at all.
Between 2001 and 2004, sub-prime mortgages grew from $160 billion to $540 billion. And between 2005 and 2007, Fannie Mae’s acquisition of mortgages with less than 10% down almost tripled.
These loans are now known as “sub-prime” and “alt A” loans.
At the time they were made, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac encouraged their issuance by lowering their standards and buying them up from the now vilified mortgage brokers, S&Ls, banks and Wall Street investment banks.
This activity was not due to a lack of regulation or oversight as you claim. Both companies are under the direct supervision of a federal regulator and Congress. At the time these loans were being purchased by these two Government Sponsored Enterprises, their actions were defended by many in Congress who, led by Senator Chris Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank, saw such reckless lending as a successful government initiative.
At the same time, the easy money policies of the Federal Open Market Committee, of which you were a voting member, were feeding an asset bubble in residential real estate, providing what proved to be an irresistible lure not only for speculators, but also for American families trying desperately to buy a house before inflation robbed them of their chance for home ownership.
Yes, mortgage brokers and banks encouraged reckless borrowing, though many who borrowed, with a little honest reflection, could have known that they would be unable to meet the financial obligation of paying the mortgage that they were using to buy a house that they could not afford.
Nor does any of this excuse the poor judgment of those on Wall Street who levered their firms’ balance sheets so that even a 4% loss on their investments would leave them either bankrupt or in need of a bailout.
But, the culpability of those in the private sector should not be used to cover up or excuse the irresponsible behavior of those in the federal government.
* To be continued...
* OOP...!!! LOOKS LIKE THIS IS GONNA BE A THREE-PARTER! CONTINUING...!!! (Part 2 of 3)
The self-regulatory check normally provided by markets on activities that are likely to lose money — lenders backing away — was simply blocked by the government’s intervention in the capital markets.
As you must know, six top executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission with securities fraud for hiding the size of the purchases of low quality mortgages from the market.
In addition, the normal check on excessive leverage provided by unwilling lenders was overwhelmed by the perception, now validated, that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac debt were backed by the full faith and credit of the federal government.
This created a willing buyer backed by the federal government with unlimited access to credit markets and a trillion dollar budget.
No wonder S&Ls and Wall Street found ways to satisfy the demand.
Blaming a lack of regulation for the subsequent losses is political spin meant to cover up the greed and corruption on Pennsylvania Avenue that led to the crisis.
Second, your claim that increased regulatory oversight would have prevented the crisis requires a credulous belief in the wisdom and courage of those in power. Regulators with all of the necessary powers have failed in their most basic task of preventing fraud including Bernie Maddoff’s Ponzi scheme, and now the still unexplained disappearance of $1.6 billion of customer money at MF Global. Yet, you ask us to believe tens of thousands of pages of new regulations will somehow empower you and other elite public servants to prevent another financial crisis?
As we know now, you and the other members of the Federal Open Market Committee in 2006 did not grasp the implications of the then faltering housing market for the general economy or the health of the banking system.
As a consequence, you and your colleagues did not use the powers you had to head off the financial crisis when there was still plenty of time to act.
As former Prime Minister Tony Blair writes in his memoir, "A Journey of My Political Life," an important contributor to the financial crisis was a failure “of understanding. We didn’t spot it … it wasn’t that we were powerless to prevent it even if we had seen it coming; it wasn’t a failure of regulation in the sense that we lacked the power to intervene. Had regulators said to the leaders that a huge crisis was about to break, we wouldn’t have said: There’s nothing we can do about it until we get more regulation through. We would have acted. But they didn’t say that.”
* To be continued...
* CONCLUDING... (Part 3 0f 3)
Third, the new regulatory regime for the financial industry created by the Dodd-Frank bill — ironically named after two of the perpetrators of the financial crisis — omits any reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
[T]these two state sponsored financial giants have cost taxpayers more than $140 billion and are seeking billions more in bailout funds.
At the same time, HUD is moving forward on issuing new rules that would support racial quotas for bank mortgages, which no doubt will again force banks to make loans to individuals who cannot afford them.
In light of this evidence and your own experience, your promise that a new, expansive regulatory regime reduces the risk of financial crisis is not credible. The regulatory maze created by Dodd-Frank not only robs the private sector of real resources that otherwise would be committed to allocating capital to credit worthy borrowers, it also undermines market skepticism essential to preventing systemic risk.
In addition, it puts even more power in the hands of a few individuals who, like you, are fallible, rather than dispersing power among market participants.
You conclude your essay by writing: “We cannot afford to forget the lessons of the crisis and the damage it caused to millions of Americans. Amnesia is what causes financial crises.”
With all due respect Mr. Secretary, federal government policies, not amnesia, were at the heart of the financial crisis. The arrogance of power revealed by your selective memory and political spin, and the expansive regulatory regime you support are now the primary source of systemic risk to the U.S. financial system and the economic security of the American people.
Post a Comment