The Purpose of a Strong Military is to Defend the United States!

By Ron Paul

*  *  *

The Republican presidential debates have become so heated and filled with insults, it almost seems we are watching a pro wrestling match. There is no civility, and I wonder whether the candidates are about to come to blows. But despite what appears to be total disagreement among them, there is one area where they all agree. They all promise that if elected they will “rebuild the military.”

What does “rebuild the military” mean?

Has the budget been gutted? Have the useless weapons programs like the F-35 finally been shut down?

No, the United States still spends more on its military than the next 14 countries combined.

And the official military budget is only part of the story. The total spending on the U.S. empire is well over one trillion dollars per year.

Under the Obama Administration the military budget is still 41% more than it was in 2001, and seven percent higher than at the peak of the Cold War.

Russia, which the neocons claim is the greatest threat to the United States, spends about one-tenth what we do on its military. China, the other “greatest threat,” has a military budget less than 25% of ours.

* TWO POINT: 1) RUSSIA ISN'T THE PROBLEM - CHINA IS; 2) CHINA'S MILITARY SPENDING IS UNDERSTATED... THE NUMBERS CAN'T BE TRUSTED... AND IN ANY CASE IT'S CHINESE MILITARISM... WHAT THEY'RE DOING WITH THEIR MILITARY... THAT POSES THE PROBLEM.

Last week the Pentagon announced it is sending a small naval force of U.S. warships to the South China Sea because, as Commander of the US Pacific Command Adm. Harry Harris told the House Armed Services Committee, China is militarizing the area. Yes, China is supposedly militarizing the area around China, so the U.S. is justified in sending its own military to the area. Is that a wise use of the U.S. military?

* UH... YES... YES IT IS. ALSO... THERE'S NO "SUPPOSEDLY" ABOUT IT; CHINA IS MILITARIZING THE AREA "AROUND CHINA" - INCLUDING AROUND THE PHILIPPINES.

The U.S. military maintains over 900 bases in 130 countries. It is actively involved in at least seven wars right now, including in Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, and elsewhere. U.S. Special Forces are deployed in 134 countries across the globe. Does that sound like a military that has been gutted?

* NOPE. BUT IT DOES SOUND LIKE A MILITARY THAT HAS BEEN OVER-STRETCHED AND FRANKLY OVER-USED. (YET AT THE SAME TIME... WHERE AND WHEN WE SHOULD FIGHT... THINK IRAN "CAPTURING" TWO U.S. NAVAL VESSELS NOT MANY WEEKS BACK... WE DON'T FIGHT; WE MEEKLY SURRENDER.)

I do not agree with the presidential candidates, but I do agree that the military needs to be rebuilt. I would rebuild it in a very different way, however. I would not rebuild it according to the demands of the military-industrial complex, which cares far more about getting rich than about protecting our country.

* FOLKS... THAT CRITIQUE IS MORE TRUE THAN NOT. PAUL'S RIGHT THERE!

I would not rebuild the military so that it can overthrow more foreign governments who refuse to do the bidding of Washington’s neocons.

* PRETTY SURE THE FOUNDERS WOULD AGREE WITH PAUL THERE; I CERTAINLY DO! HOW'D TOPPLING GADDAFI WORK OUT FOR US? HELL... HOW'D TOPPLING SADDAM WORK OUT FOR US?

(*JUST SHAKING MY HEAD*)

I would not rebuild the military so that it can better protect our wealthy allies in Europe, NATO, Japan, and South Korea.

* YEP. MILITARY "WELFARE" IS STILL... WELFARE. AND I'M ANTI-WELFARE!

I would not rebuild the military so that it can better occupy countries overseas and help create conditions for blowback here at home.

* AND FOLKS... WE'VE GOTTEN BLOWBACK...

(*NODDING*)

No. The best way to really “rebuild” the U.S. military would be to stop abusing the military in the first place.

* AGREED!

The purpose of the U.S. military is to defend the United States.

* DO YOU SEE THE U.S. - OUR VERY TERRITORIAL AND CULTURAL SOVEREIGNTY - BEING DEFENDED? I DON'T! WE'RE BEING INVADED! WE'VE BEEN SUFFERING INVASION! THE POLITICIANS IN WASHINGTON - PARTICULARLY OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATS, BUT WITH PLENTY OF RINO SUPPORT - HAVE BEEN WELCOMING THE INVASION AND ACTUALLY ASSISTING THE INVADERS!

The purpose of the U.S. military is not to make the world safe for oil pipelines, or corrupt Gulf monarchies, or NATO, or Israel.

* YEP...

(*STILL NODDING*)

Unlike the neocons who are so eager to send our troops to war, I have actually served in the U.S. military.

* ONE MORE TIME...

Unlike the neocons who are so eager to send our troops to war, I have actually served in the U.S. military.

* OH, HELL... THIS BEARS REPEATING AGAIN AND AGAIN... SO...

Unlike the neocons who are so eager to send our troops to war, I have actually served in the U.S. military.

(*SILENCE*)

I understand that to keep our military strong we must constrain our foreign policy.

* BINGO!

We must adopt a policy of non-intervention and a strong defense of this country.

* ...AND A STRONG DEFENSE OF THIS COUNTRY... THIS COUNTRY... THIS COUNTRY...

The neocons will weaken our country and our military by promoting more war. We need to “rebuild” the military by restoring as its mission the defense of the United States, not of Washington’s overseas empire.

* ABSOFRIGGIN'LUTELY!