Terry Miller, director of the Center for International
Trade and Economics at the Heritage Foundation, via today's Wall St. Journal:
[A]fter seven straight years of decline, the U.S. has
dropped out of the top 10 most economically free countries.
* YES, FOLKS... SEVEN STRAIGHT YEARS... STARTING UNDER
BUSH... ACCELERATING UNDER OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATS.
[A]ccording to the 2014 Index of Economic Freedom,
released Tuesday by the Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal, World
economic freedom has reached record levels.
For 20 years, the index has measured a nation's
commitment to free enterprise on a scale of 0 to 100 by evaluating 10
categories, including fiscal soundness, government size and property rights.
These commitments have powerful effects: Countries achieving higher levels of
economic freedom consistently and measurably outperform others in economic
growth, long-term prosperity and social progress. Botswana, for example, has
made gains through low tax rates and political stability.
* BOTSWANA... AS WE SPIRAL DOWN...
Those losing freedom, on the other hand...
* MEANING US - AS IN THE USA.
...risk economic stagnation, high unemployment and
deteriorating social conditions.
* RISK...?!?! LOOK AROUND YOU, PEOPLE!
It's not hard to see why the U.S. is losing ground. Even
marginal tax rates exceeding 43% cannot finance runaway government spending,
which has caused the national debt to skyrocket. The Obama administration
continues to shackle entire sectors of the economy with regulation, including
health care, finance and energy. The intervention impedes both personal freedom
and national prosperity.
But as the U.S. economy languishes, many countries are
leaping ahead, thanks to policies that enhance economic freedom — the same [free
market policies] that [once] made the U.S. economy the most powerful in the
world.
Governments in 114 countries have taken steps in the past
year to increase the economic freedom of their citizens. Forty-three countries,
from every part of the world, have now reached their highest economic freedom
ranking in the index's history.
Hong Kong continues to dominate the list, followed by
Singapore, Australia, Switzerland, New Zealand and Canada. These are the only
countries to earn the index's "economically free" designation.
Mauritius earned top honors among African countries and Chile excelled in Latin
America. Despite the turmoil in the Middle East, several Gulf states, led by
Bahrain, earned designation as "mostly free."
A realignment is under way in Europe, according to the
index's findings. Eighteen European nations, including Germany, Sweden, Georgia
and Poland, have reached new highs in economic freedom. By contrast, five
others — Greece, Italy, France, Cyprus and the United Kingdom — registered
scores lower than they received when the index started two decades ago.
The most improved players are in Eastern Europe,
including Estonia, Lithuania and the Czech Republic. These countries have
gained the most economic freedom over the past two decades. And it's no
surprise: Those who have lived under communism have no trouble recognizing the
benefits of a free-market system. But countries that have experimented with
milder forms of socialism, such as Sweden, Denmark and Canada, also have made
impressive moves toward greater economic freedom, with gains near 10 points or
higher on the index scale. Sweden, for instance, is now ranked 20th out of 178
countries, up from 34th out of 140 countries in 1996.
The U.S. and the U.K, historically champions of free
enterprise, have suffered the most pronounced declines.
Both countries now fall in the "mostly free"
category.
Some of the worst performers are in Latin America,
particularly Venezuela, Argentina, Ecuador and Bolivia. All are governed by
crony-populist regimes pushing policies that have made property rights less
secure, spending unsustainable and inflation evermore threatening.
Despite financial crises and recessions, the global
economy has expanded by nearly 70% in 20 years, to $54 trillion in 2012 from
$32 trillion in 1993. Hundreds of millions of people have left grinding poverty
behind as their economies have become freer. But it is an appalling, avoidable
human tragedy how many of the world's peoples remain unfree — and poor.
The record of increasing economic freedom elsewhere makes
it inexcusable that a country like the U.S. continues to pursue policies
antithetical to its own growth, while wielding its influence to encourage other
countries to chart the same disastrous course.
3 comments:
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014/01/14/obama-on-executive-actions-ive-got-a-pen-and-ive-got-a-phone/
President Barack Obama predicts Congress will be busy this year debating a renewal of jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed...
* JOBLESS "BENEFITS." FOR THE "LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYED." I BELIEVE THE CORRECT TERM WOULD BE W*E*L*F*A*R*E.
* UNEMPLOYMENT "BENEFITS" ARE (OR AT LEAST USED TO BE) "INSURANCE" BENEFITS WHICH WERE PAID FOR IN ADVANCE VIA PREMIUMS. NOW... TOTALLY DELINKED... THUS... WELFARE.
...and an immigration overhaul.
* AMNESTY.
(*SMIRK*)
But the President says he wants his Cabinet also to focus on executive actions that don’t require legislation.
* DICTATORSHIP.
(*SHRUG*)
“We are not just going to be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that we are providing Americans the kind of help that they need. I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone,” Obama said.
* AND THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS HAVE NO BACKBONE AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF DEMOCRATS CARE NO MORE FOR THE CONSTITUTION THAN DOES OBAMA.
* FOLKS... THIS ISN'T WATERGATE WHERE REPUBLICANS DESERTED NIXON OUT OF A GREATER LOYALTY TO THE CONSTITUTION. THOSE DAYS ARE GONE. NOW... IT'S ONLY ABOUT POWER. WELCOME TO AMERIKA.
Obama continued: ”And I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions that move the ball forward in helping to make sure our kids are getting the best education possible...
* NO. HE CAN'T. NOT LEGALLY. (AND IN ANY CASE, WE KNOW VIA DECADE AFTER DECADE OF EVIDENCE THAT GOVERNMENT "ACTION" DOES NOT LEAD TO OUR KIDS GETTING THE BEST EDUCATION POSSIBLE. INDEED, GOVERNMENT ACTION IS OFTEN THE PROBLEM - NOT THE SOLUTION.
...making sure that our businesses are getting the kind of support and help they need to grow and advance, to make sure that people are getting the skills that they need to get those jobs that our businesses are creating.”
(*JUST SHAKING MY HEAD*)
* FOLKS... BULLSHIT DIPPED IN PISS.
Obama stated he wants to “advance a mission” in an effort to unify all Americans.
* SUICIDE...?!?!
(*GETTING ALL EXCITED*)
“One of the things that I’m going to be talking to my Cabinet about is how do we use all the tools available to us, not just legislation, in order to advance a mission that I think unifies all Americans,” Obama said. “The belief that everybody’s got to take responsibility, everybody’s got to work hard, but if you do, that you can support a family and meet the kinds of obligations that you have to yourself and your family, but also to your communities and your neighbors.”
(*ROLLING MY EYES*)
* UNICORNS FARTING RAINBOWS...
He says he is “very pleased” that Congress has agreed on a $1 trillion budget measure and urges lawmakers to pass it promptly.
* PISSING GOOD MONEY AFTER BAD... (MONEY WE DON'T HAVE, BY THE WAY...)
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/criminal-charges-not-expected-in-irs-probe-2014-01-13-18103216?link=MW_latest_news
The Federal Bureau of Investigation doesn’t plan to file criminal charges over the Internal Revenue Service’s heightened scrutiny of conservative groups, according to law-enforcement officials...
* BIG FRIGGIN' SURPRISE, HUH...
(*SNORT*)
* I COULD HAVE "REPORTED" THIS WHEN THE NEWS FIRST HIT! (IN FACT, I PROBABLY DID!)
Since the outset, Republicans have voiced skepticism that the Obama administration would properly investigate itself. Last week, Rep. Darrell Issa (R., Calif.), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, challenged the impartiality of a Justice Department prosecutor handling the case because...
* BECAUSE...
...she had made donations to the Obama campaign.
* YET ANOTHER "SURPRISE."
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/01/13/79-of-Obamacare-Enrollees-Qualify-for-Subsidies
Nearly four in five Americans who have enrolled in ObamaCare need taxpayer-funded subsidies to pay for their premiums.
(*CLAP...CLAP...CLAP*)
As Businessweek noted, people "earning up to four times the poverty rate—as much as $96,000 a year for a family of four"—can get Obamacare subsidies from the federal government.
(*CLAP...CLAP...CLAP*)
* BUT FUCK ME AMD MARY...
(*SPITTING ON THE FLOOR*)
* NO. I'M NOT MAD BECAUSE WE DON'T GET A SUBSIDY. I'M MAD BECAUSE I'VE GOT TO PAY FOR PEOPLE EARNING MORE MONEY THAN US TO BE SUBSIDIZED!!!
Post a Comment