Follow the bouncing newsbite ball as you read this stand-alone newsbite:
* * * * *
Senior Obama administration officials are defending Iranian nuclear violations...
* OF... COURSE... THEY... ARE...
(*CRADLING MY HEAD IN MY HANDS*)
...in the aftermath of a bombshell report published Wednesday by the United Nations indicating that Iran has failed to live up to its nuclear-related obligations, according to sources apprised of the situation.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) disclosed yesterday that Iran has failed to meet its commitments under the interim Joint Plan of Action to convert recently enriched uranium gas to powder.
While Iran has reduced the amount of enriched uranium gas in its stockpiles, it has failed to dispose of these materials in a way that satisfies the requirements of the nuclear accord struck with the United States and other powers in 2013.
Secretary of State John Kerry declared last summer that Iran would be forced to comply with such restrictions...
* APPARENTLY NOT!
...and State Department officials were assuring reporters as recently as last month that the Iranians would meet their obligations.
* FOLKS... YA CAN'T MAKE THIS $HIT UP...
Wednesday’s disclosure by the IAEA sent the State Department rushing to downplay the Iranian violation.
* I'M SURE IT DID!
Obama administration officials insisted that despite Iran’s failure to meet its obligations, negotiations were still on track and that Tehran would face no repercussions.
One U.S. official who spoke with the Associated Press on Wednesday said that instead of converting its uranium gas into uranium dioxide powder as required, Iran had transformed it into another substance. The IAEA found that Iran had converted just 9% of the relevant stockpile into uranium dioxide. The official went on to downplay concerns about Iran’s violation, claiming that Tehran was only having some “technical problems.”
(*ROLLING MY EYES*)
David Albright, a nuclear expert and founder of the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), warned that the United States is weakening its requirements on Tehran as a final deal gets closer. “The choosing of a weaker condition that must be met is not a good precedent for interpreting more important provisions in a final deal,” Albright wrote in an analysis published late Wednesday.
* YA THINK...?!?!
The IAEA’s disclosures are in contrast to comments made by Kerry last summer when he assured observers that Iran would live up to the interim agreement.
The Israel Project (TIP), which has sent officials to Vienna to track the deal, wrote in an email to reporters that the administration looked like it was “playing Tehran’s lawyer” in a bid to defuse potential fallout from the IAEA’s report.
One Western source present in Vienna said the administration is scrambling to ensure that nothing interferes with a final deal. “Once again, the White House will go to any length needed to preserve the Obama-Iran deal, even if it means covering up Iran’s failure to convert all of the nuclear material as promised,” said the source.
* FOLKS... WE MIGHT AS WELL HAVE AN ACTUAL "MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE" IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
“If they had admitted Iran failed to live up to the letter of the JPOA — as is the case — this one-week extension period of the JPOA would be totally invalidated and the talks would be over,” the source added.