Friday, July 22, 2016

Peggy Noonan's Take on Trump's Speech Last Night



Peggy Noonan writing in the WSJ

*  *  *

Two headlines on the week, and some speeches.

Donald Trump effectively won the Republican primary in the first week of May, meaning the GOP has had 2½ months to do what it has always done, even under duress, such as in 1964 and 1976: come together.

They have not.

From day one of the convention it was clear the GOP is a bitterly divided party and not even bothering to hide it.

* WHICH IS WHY I HAVE ADVISED THAT TRUMP SPEND MORE TIME BASHING THE RINOs. FRANKLY... I SEE NO DOWN SIDE - INSTEAD I SEE A HUGE UPSIDE!

* TRUMP DID REACH OUT TO BERNIE VOTERS. AND THAT WAS SMART. AND... IT WAS "RIGHT" NOT SIMPLY IN A PRAGMATIC SENSE, BUT IN AN ETHICAL SENSE. YEAH... MANY OF THOSE FOLKS ARE VERY... CONFUSED... ABOUT HOW TO FIX AMERICA'S PROBLEMS - BUT MANY OF 'EM CORRECTLY IDENTIFY MANY OF THE PROBLEMS! I CAN "WORK" WITH PEOPLE LIKE THAT!

It failed to unite not because it had poor leadership or the nominee didn’t know how to do it, though both are true.

* TYPICAL NOONAN PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE BULLSHIT.

(*SPITTING ON THE GROUND*)

More killingly it failed to unite because it didn’t want to. Everyone’s in his corner. Donald Trump failed to change his style in a way that would have given cover to those who would have, with considerable relief, joined him.

* "STYLE, STYLE, STYLE"...

(*ROLLING MY EYES*)

* FORGIVE ME IF I'M FOCUSED ON SUBSTANCE.

(*AGAIN SPITTING ON THE GROUND*)

On the other hand, anti-Trump forces continued to look down on Mr. Trump’s supporters and grant them nothing in terms of motivation, sincerity, insight.

Most important, though no one in Cleveland was keen to talk about it, there is the split between the base and the top on such huge and fundamental issues as immigration, trade and entitlements.

* UM... PEGGY...??? WE TALK ABOUT IT ALL THE TIME. (AND AGAIN... TRUMP SHOULD ATTACK THE RINOs WITH THE SAME FERVOR HE ATTACKS THE DEMOCRAT LEFT!)

The base came to this convention, which was middle-class and dressed down.

* UPPER MIDDLE CLASS, PEGGY. I KNOW THE SORT OF FOLKS WHO ATTEND THESE CONVENTIONS. UPPER MIDDLE CLASS TO WEALTHY.

The wealthy and connected largely stayed away.

* APPARENTLY PEGGY DIDN'T SEE THE PAYPAL GUY'S SPEECH...

(*LOL*)

(*JUST SHAKING MY HEAD*)

* PEGGY NOONAN IS SUCH A TRANSPARENT DUNCE.

You didn’t see them swanning from reception to party to caucus. It spoke volumes. Now and then you remember that snobbery is an actual force in life.

If each side hates the other and believes in different things, how do they come together again?

* IT'S CALLED LOVE OF COUNTRY, PEG. IT'S CALLED GIVING A DAMN ABOUT THE WORLD WE LEAVE OUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN.

Connected to that, the second headline, which has to do with the unknowability of the moment we’re in.

* SOMETIMES I WONDER IF PEGGY NOONAN IS... SLIGHTLY RETARDED.

The shrewdest old political pro, the brightest young delegate, the owlish political journalist — they didn’t know exactly what they were witnessing. Was it the formal start of an epic political disaster? The birth of a new GOP more identified with the struggles of its base? Is 2016 a particular and contained event, or does it mark the beginning of some long-term realignment? As for Mr. Trump, is he a lightning storm that lit things up, caused some damage, will play itself out and pass? Or is he an earthquake that changed the actual shape of things, the literal lay of the land?

Nobody involved here, nobody watching, knew. I’ve never quite seen such intellectual modesty among people who are usually quick in their eagerness to explain it all to you.

* I'D HATE PEGGY'S CROWD. I'D LITERALLY DESPISE THEM. (COULD YOU IMAGINE ME AT ONE OF HER DINNER PARTIES...?!?!)

(*RUEFUL CHUCKLE*)

There were a number of good speeches. Donald Trump Jr. was strong and persuasive on Tuesday night. The next morning, at a Wall Street Journal event, he made a better case for his father than his father has.

* AGAIN WITH THE PATENTED PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE SHTICK...

(*ROLLING MY EYES*)

He talked about the forgotten middle American and referred to himself, humorously, as “a Fifth Avenue redneck.”

(*STANDING OVATION*)

When pressed on how a man as divisive as his father could unify the nation, he answered that one way to unify the country is to see that its people have jobs: “When people are doing well it’s amazing how much unity you’ll get from that.”

Mike Pence’s speech was modest, simple and strong. He is going to be a powerful and effective figure in the coming campaign. A longtime staffer told me he was surprised how relaxed the governor was as he prepared. He’d seen him over the years be nervous about smaller, less important speeches. Mr. Pence, the staffer said, told him the reason was that he was completely at peace with his decision to run with Mr. Trump.

(*THUMBS UP*)

Ted Cruz did himself damage.

* YEP...

By the end of his tireless campaign for the nomination he was semi-endearing.

* Er... OK...

(*SCRATCHING MY HEAD AT THAT ONE*)

Wednesday night he resurrected Snaky Ted.

* YEP!

He spoke highly of freedom and went after President Obama. Sometimes he half-laughed after speaking a line, as if to say You know this is showbiz, right? It showed an unbecoming detachment. He told the audience not to stay home in November but vote for the right person, then forgot to say who that person might be.

* "DOUCHE BAG TED!"

(*GRIN*)

(*WINK*)

If you can’t endorse, good for you and stay home. That isn’t politics, it’s basic human comportment.

* GOOD FOR YOU, PEGGY!

If someone you’re certain is awful invites you to a party, you politely decline. You don’t go, walk into the room, and punch your host in the head. Mr. Cruz miscalculated, thinking if he snubbed Trump half the delegates would cheer. Instead almost all booed.

Ted Cruz thought the media would laud his courage and integrity. They saw him as wounded and treated him as prey.

* YEP...

When his campaign ended in June, I attended a small dinner in his honor. Mr. Cruz was charming, modest and funny. When we said goodnight I told him I felt, in retrospect, that I hadn’t always been just to him and was glad I’d have a chance to be more generous in the future. Apparently I will need still more time. What a jerk.

* HA! HA! HA! HA!

(*VIRTUAL HUG*)

Donald Trump’s speech was important. He is a vivid figure and for a year has elicited strong reactions. By now he’s exhausting. We have Trump Fatigue.

* MAYBE YOU DO, PEG; NOT ME.

(*SHRUG*)

* IF ANYTHING... I HAVE CRUZ FATIGUE. IF ANYTHING... I HAVE "PEOPLE" FATIGUE. EACH DAY I DEAL WITH SO MANY STUPID PEOPLE...

(*SHRUG*)

* FRANKLY... IT'S EXHAUSTING.

Also, who doesn’t know how he feels about him? His acceptance speech was an opportunity to break through in a new way and flesh out his purpose. I think he succeeded, though with a certain grimness. He’d probably reply that the times are grim.

* UM... THEY ARE, PEG; HE LAID IT OUT; I LAY IT OUT EVERY DAY ON FB AND ON MY BLOG. (SERIOUSLY... DO YOU NOT "GET" THAT AMERICA IS IN STEEP DECLINE AND THAT THE WHOLE POINT OF "FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE" IS TO DRIVE US OVER THE CLIFF?)

We have to assess the true facts of our nation, he said: “We cannot afford to be so politically correct anymore.”

* AND... HE'S RIGHT!

He spoke of “the plain facts that have been edited out of your nightly news,” including the costs of illegal immigration and the victims of economic decline.

* AGAIN... BROWSE THROUGH MY FB POSTINGS... MY BLOG POSTINGS; GO BACK AS FAR AS YOU CAN; TRUMP WASN'T LYING! WHAT HE SAYS IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE!

Mr. Trump argued that the past eight years of U.S. foreign policy have been disastrous to peace and stability. “But Hillary Clinton’s legacy does not have to be America’s legacy.”

(*STANDING OVATION*)

Does he want a ban on Muslims? No. “We must immediately suspend immigration from any nation that has been compromised by terrorism until such time as proven vetting mechanisms have been put in place.” This stand has always driven his enemies crazy, and Mr. Trump usually spoke of it sloppily, either deliberately or not. But to most Americans it will sound like simple common sense.

* BUT... NOT TO YOU, PEGGY? (NOTICE... SHE TAKES NO STAND.)

(*SMIRK*)

He was frankly populist: “I have joined the political arena so that the powerful can no longer beat up on people who cannot defend themselves. . . . My greatest compassion will be for our own struggling citizens.”

* AND... WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT...???

He stands, he asserted, for “the forgotten” — not as their tribune or their leader, but “their voice.”

* AND ON MANY ISSUES HE CLEARLY IS - THUS... HIS BEING THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT.

* SERIOUSLY, FOLKS... IS SHE RETARDED... A BIT...???

Cleverly: “My opponent asks her supporters to recite a three-word loyalty pledge. It reads, ‘I’m with her.’ I choose to recite a different pledge: ‘I’m with you, the American people.’”

* GOD... BLESS... DONALD... TRUMP!

It was not an eloquent speech, not lofty, very plain and blunt. It covered a lot of territory and went too long.

* BUT HAD IT BEEN SHORTER YOU'D BE WRITING THAT IT LACKED DETAIL. (YOU'RE SO FULL OF SHIT, NOONAN!)

It had no leavening humor.

* NOT MUCH TO LAUGH ABOUT. THE LEFT HAS BEEN DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY.

It is strange to see a New Yorker so uninterested in wit.

* SERIOUSLY, FOLKS... THIS STUPID WOMAN THINKS SHE COMES OFF AS INTELLIGENT. IT'S AMAZING WHAT LIVING IN A BUBBLE DOES TO SOME FOLKS.

It was at points too hyped and declarative, and it was sometimes grandiose.

(*ROLLING MY EYES*)

But it was powerful.

After reading a copy of the speech leaked in advance by a mischief maker, an anti-Trump conservative intellectual emailed me. “He’s going to win,” he said. The moment at least was not unknowable to him.

* LET US HOPE AND PRAY - AND WORK TOWARDS A TRUMP VICTORY... A VICTORY FOR AMERICA!

Monday, July 18, 2016

Blue Lives Matter...



On several occasions over the past few years I've thrown the following observation - and question - out:

With tens of thousands of skilled, combat-tested veterans out there - some still active, others serving in the reserves, the majority however now discharged and living their lives simply as "veterans" - frankly, I'm amazed that there hasn't been a rash of political assassinations in this country over the past decade.

"Why," I wonder?

It's certainly a fair question given the fact that anyone who pays attention and gives a damn knows that 22 veterans per day exhibit the ultimate sign that they've been "damaged" via committing suicide.

Imagine... the pain... physical or mental anguish... being so extreme that it pushes one to suicide - the ultimate "anti-social" act of "escape."

Why suicide and not homicide?

The anger many feel against our government and its masters is palpable. The polls bear me out on this. Americans hate our Congress. Only 11% of Americans approve of the job Congress is doing. And beyond our communal contempt for Congress, Americans increasingly distrust the media... the courts... academia... and view government as a whole as incompetent and irresponsible at best, corrupt and venial at worst.

So... why haven't American politicians been targeted for violence?

Yes, yes, there was the Gabby Giffords shooting. But that was not "political" as such. (At least that's the story we've been told by government and media.) Indeed, the shooter, Jared Leigh Loughner, was initially diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia and deemed incompetent to stand trial - though later (August 2012), absent much media coverage, he was judged competent to stand trial and at the hearing he plead guilty to 19 counts and was sentenced to life plus 140 years in federal prison.

Now, in 2016, year eight of "The Age of Obama," we've suffered a rash of political assassinations - only the targets... the victims... haven't been the politicians and government officials whom so many hate and whom it's fair to say the majority of our citizenry feels a fair amount of contempt for and anger and disgust toward. No. The targets... the victims... have been police officers.

Rightly or wrongly, many Americans feel Barack Obama and the Left bear some responsibility for what's been going on... for the murders of police officers. Both Obama and Hillary Clinton have often voiced support for the "Black Lives Matter" Movement (BLM).

Ponder this my friends: The Dallas shooter was a black army veteran. The Baton Rouge was a black marine veteran. Both shootings were driven by politics, ideology, and racial disenchantment.

Again, folks... the "tone" we've gotten out of the Obama White House, the Lynch (and before that the Holder) Justice Department, and the Left in general is clearly one of sympathy for the false narrative that "the white power structure," "the blue power structure," unfairly and unjustly targets blacks (and to a lesser extent Hispanics).

Of course neither President Obama nor his allies and supporters in positions of power "justify" the ambushes... the assassinations... but back to that "tone"... clearly neither Obama nor Hillary Clinton see BLM as a problem - much less some sort of "insurgent movement." Indeed... Obama has invited BLM leaders to the White House!

I poise this question: "What's next?"

Back to the tens of thousands of skilled, highly-trained veterans out there - and the hundreds of thousands of armed law enforcement personnel (not to mention millions of retired cops - most no doubt possessing weapons and retaining the skills they were once practiced in) who have no doubt been following "incidents" such as Dallas and Baton Rouge with horror; what if a certain percentage of them decide that the only way to protect their brothers in blue and the greater society is to "fight fire with fire?"

What if a new "movement" emerges - call it "Blue Lives Matter," or BlLM for short?

What if misguided actors identifying with BlLM start targeting... black politicians?

Yes, I know, most of you are probably thinking "Barack Obama." After all, he's the most powerful black politician in the country... in the world. But, no... I'm actually not thinking of the President. I'm thinking of the aforementioned Attorney General Lynch... former Attorney General Holder... members of the Congressional Black Caucus.

Apparently some small minority on the Left - and within the "Black Community" - want to see a race war break out on the streets of America. Many Americans believe this race war is already here. What if those who believe "Blue Lives Matter" answer their challenge with "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth?"

What if in "retaliation" for the murders of policemen the next assassination target is... Al Sharpton... or Jesse Jackson? And what if such targeting is successful?

Folks... I pose the questions the media and the politicians won't.

I'm not calling for this. I'm simply pondering the sheer numbers of serving military members, reservists, veterans, police officers, retired police officers, and plain ol' armed citizens here in America and wondering "What happens if a mere fraction of 1% of these people become "radicalized" in the same way self-described "domestic terrorists" and those targeting our police officers have been "radicalized?"

Frankly... I'm worried.

I can't imagine that sooner or later senseless violence won't be "countered" with more senseless violence - only this time in "retaliation."

No one wants a race war. (Or do they...???)

No one wants political and ideological "warfare" to descend into actual warfare. (Or do they?)

The Left is playing a very dangerous "game."

God bless America.