Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Re-Civilize America... Let Our Citizens Drink!


One of my heroes...
*  *  *  *  *  *
The National Minimum Drinking Age Act, passed by Congress 30 years ago this July, is a gross violation of civil liberties and must be repealed.

(*STANDING OVATION*)

It is absurd and unjust that young Americans can vote, marry, enter contracts, and serve in the military at 18 but cannot buy an alcoholic drink in a bar or restaurant. The age 21 rule sets the United States apart from all advanced Western nations and lumps it with small or repressive countries like Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Indonesia, Qatar, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates.

* WELL... NOT REALLY FAIR TO THROW MUSLIM COUNTRIES IN THE MIX...

Congress was stampeded into this puritanical law by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), who with all good intentions were wrongly intruding into an area of personal choice exactly as did the hymn-singing 19th-century Temperance crusaders, typified by Carrie Nation smashing beer barrels with her hatchet.

Temperance fanaticism eventually triumphed and gave us 14 years of Prohibition.

That in turn spawned the crime syndicates for booze smuggling, laying the groundwork for today’s global drug trade. Thanks a lot, Carrie!

Now that marijuana regulations have been liberalized in Colorado...

* AN ISSUE I'M STILL ON THE FENCE ON... STILL GO BACK AND FORTH ON...

...it’s time to strike down this dictatorial national law.

* HEAR! HEAR!

Government is not our nanny. The decrease in drunk-driving deaths in recent decades is at least partly attributable to more uniform seat-belt use and a strengthening of DWI penalties. Today, furthermore, there are many other causes of traffic accidents, such as the careless use of cell phones or prescription drugs like Ambien – implicated in the recent trial and acquittal of Kerry Kennedy for driving while impaired.

* JUSTICE IS OFTEN BLIND WHEN IT COMES TO THE RICH, POWERFUL, AND LIBERAL.

Learning how to drink responsibly is a basic lesson in growing up — as it is in wine-drinking France or in Germany, with its family-oriented beer gardens and festivals. Wine was built into my own Italian-American upbringing, where children were given sips of my grandfather’s home-made wine. This civilized practice descends from antiquity. Beer was a nourishing food in Egypt and Mesopotamia, and wine was identified with the life force in Greece and Rome: In vino veritas (in wine, truth). Wine as a sacred symbol of unity and regeneration remains in the Christian Communion service. Virginia Woolf wrote that wine with a fine meal lights a “subtle and subterranean glow, which is the rich yellow flame of rational intercourse.”

* AND I'LL DRINK TO ALL OF THAT!

What this cruel 1984 law did is deprive young people of safe spaces where they could happily drink cheap beer, socialize, chat, and flirt in a free but controlled public environment. Hence in the 1980s we immediately got the scourge of crude binge drinking at campus fraternity keg parties, cut off from the adult world. Women in that boorish free-for-all were suddenly fighting off date rape. Club drugs — Ecstasy, methamphetamine, ketamine (a veterinary tranquilizer) — surged at raves for teenagers and on the gay male circuit scene.

* FOLKS... THIS IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE! WE'VE ALL SEEN IT! WE'RE ALL AWARE OF IT! WE NEED TO CORRECT THE 1984 MISTAKE!

Alcohol relaxes, facilitates interaction, inspires ideas, and promotes humor and hilarity. Used in moderation, it is quickly flushed from the system, with excess punished by a hangover. But deadening pills, such as today’s massively over-prescribed anti-depressants, linger in body and brain and may have unrecognized long-term side effects. Those toxic chemicals, often manufactured by shadowy firms abroad, have been worrisomely present in a recent uptick of unexplained suicides and massacres. Half of the urban professional class in the U.S. seems doped on meds these days.

(*NOD*)

As a libertarian, I support the decriminalization of marijuana, but there are many problems with pot. From my observation, pot may be great for jazz musicians and Beat poets, but it saps energy and willpower and can produce physiological feminization in men.

* ARE YOU READIJNG THIS, FOLKS? I DON'T KNOW ABOUT "FEMINIZATION," BUT THIS ENERGY AND WILLPOWER THING...
(*SHRUG*)

* WHAT  CAN I SAY? AM I AN ANTI-STONER DRUNK? YEAH... GUILTY AS CHARGED. A CULTURAL BIAS? AN IDEOLOGICAL BIAS? YEAH... SURE... BUT AS I WROTE ABOVE, I AM INDEED ON THE FENCE WITH EQUATING ALCOHOL USE WITH DRUG USE.


Also, it is difficult to measure the potency of plant-derived substances like pot. With brand-name beer or liquor, however, purchased doses have exactly the same strength and purity from one continent to another, with no fear of contamination by dangerous street additives like PCP.

Exhilaration, ecstasy, and communal vision are the gifts of Dionysus, god of wine. Alcohol’s enhancement of direct face-to-face dialogue is precisely what is needed by today’s technologically agile generation, magically interconnected yet strangely isolated by social media.

Clumsy hardcore sexting has sadly supplanted simple hanging out over a beer at a buzzing dive.

By undermining the art of conversation, the age 21 law has also had a disastrous effect on our arts and letters, with their increasing dullness and mediocrity. This tyrannical infantilizing of young Americans must stop!

Barker's Newsbites: Wednesday, April 23, 2014


Better a late start than no start at all...!


Tuesday, April 22, 2014

A Shout-Out To My Friend L.B.C.


God Bless Facebook!

(There! I said it!)

I'll admit it - the only reason I ever signed on to FB was because I needed to do so as a means of following the planning for my 30th high school reunion a few years back.

I've gotta admit, though... old friends... re-connections... new friends... all the photos, jokes, stories...

Yep. There's plenty of crap on FB. That said... there's plenty of good stuff too!

L.B.C. was actually a classmate of mine... a classmate who married a childhood friend of mine with whom I'd had a falling out. (My fault!

She and I didn't run in the same circles, but of course we knew each other.

Anyway... once I got on FB my "former" buddy and I reestablished our ties through common bonds, interests, and memories. Next thing I know... I'm friends with his wife... my former classmate... L.B.C. It turns out we have lots in common as well! 

Anyway... common interests and friendship doesn't mean people are always gonna agree on everything. That's cool. As everyone knows, my big "thing" is politics... and economics... and history... foreign affairs... governance... philosophy... ethics...

(*GUFFAW*)

So... a few days ago a conversation about personal financial responsibility branched out to a discussion on banking... which then focused on "bad bankers"... and then touched upon Thomas Jefferson and his contemporaries...

(*STILL CHUCKLING*)

Anyway... at one point I suggested L.B.C. check out my blog. She did. Next think I know the conversation moves to the Tea Party, the Koch Brothers, and Monsanto!

(*CHOKING BECAUSE I'M LAUGHING SO HARD*)

So... in honor of L.B.C. allow me to reiterate my general thoughts on the Tea Party:

First and foremost, there is no unified "Tea Party" in the sense there's a Republican Party and Democratic Party.

When referring to the "Tea Party," the most inclusive description of those who would consider themselves "members" applies to constitutional and economic issues. Pretty much anyone who would consider himself or herself a "Tea Partier" is well versed in the history, text, and meaning of the Constitution and views the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land with the Amendment Process being the only legitimate method of changing the meaning of the document (and it's Amendments) in terms of how's it was written, read and adhered to from the perspective of those Founders and post-Founders who created our Supreme Law of the Land 1788 thru 1992.

(*EXHALE*)

As to economic issues... Tea Partiers believe in financial responsibility, free markets, and the invisible hand; we hate crony capitalism as much... and perhaps even more... than we hate socialism. Tea Partiers believe in small government centered at the lowest level (villages, towns, counties, states) closest to the People.

Are Tea Partiers "anti-government." No. Anti-big government, yes... anti-out of control government, yes... libertarian-leaning government... yes! 

Now... beyond such broad statements as I've already posted... what does the (so-called) Tea Party stand for? Well, that's not a simply answerable question due to the fact that, as previous stated, there is no unified "Tea Party" with an actual platform as such. (And even if there was a platform... well... how many Republicans or Democrats believe in 100% of their Party's platform?)

All I can tell you folks is what I believe in.

I believe in the Constitution. As written. As intended to be understood line by line as each line was ratified and put into effect as a part of the Supreme Law of the Land.

I believe America was founded as a Republic and that if it were up to me we'd still be a Republic. (Yes... I'm saying we're no longer a true Republic.)

I believe that America should be the strongest military power on earth... but... that we should not be the world's "policeman." I fear and find unAmerican the military-industrial complex Eisenhower warned us about. I believe in a foreign policy that always looks to the interests of America first in the sense of George Washington's vision of foreign policy.

I believe in individual rights... and yes... in God Given Rights above and beyond the legitimate power of any government to take away from "We the People."

I believe in fiscal prudence, limited taxation, limited governmental expenditures, and strongly opposed "redistribution" of wealth.

I believe in honesty, integrity, self-reliance, and true charity as individual conscious dictates.

I could go on and on and on... but simply browsing this blog will tell the interested reader pretty much anything and everything he or she would want to know about me and my beliefs.

My bottom line as far as the "Tea Party" is concerned...

(*PAUSE*)

If one opposes the Tea Party... if one isn't in line with key Tea Party ideals... then one either doesn't understand what the Tea Party concept is all about... or... one rejects the fundamental American ideals upon which I place my hopes, faith, love, and beliefs in favor of so-called "progressive" (and) "fundamental" change.

To my friend L.B.C: If we disagree then we disagree. I'm always ready to discuss, and yes, debate, my views... my reality... my beliefs... but I'm also content to tailor my interactions to less divisive pursuits... "non-political" conversations.

(*WINK*)

Finally... whether one agrees or disagrees with me... I can guarantee that regular readers of my newsbites and stand-alone posts will gain knowledge... context... that otherwise they might not.

The thing about me... my ideals and philosophy... I'm not really a "Republican." I'm certainly not a "Democrat." My libertarian streak is wide but not all-encompassing. I'm pro-order but anti-establishment. I'm not a warmonger, but neither am I blind to the threats we face. (Where it gets confusing to some is where I see those threats coming from - often they come from us... particularly from the neo-cons embedded in both major Parties.)

Trust but verify...

Do unto others...

What's good for the goose...

Again... I'm pretty much an open book. Read me! Enjoy me! Learn from me!

(*CHUCKLE*)

Barker's Newsbites: Tuesday, April 22, 2014


G'mornin', folks! And a beautiful mornin' it is!

Partly cloudy...? Yep. But being a glass half full kinda guy I prefer to refer to the morn as partly sunny!

Showers expected later... in the afternoon...? Yep! Oh, well... we're all lookin' forward to a nice green spring and summer, right? We're beings made of 98% water, right? So what the hell... bring on a little rain!

Folks, it's two days after Easter and I'm still grateful for all my blessings.

As far as I know I'm healthy. Same for the the wife... same for the kid.

Rich? Nope. But doin' ok? Yeah...! Heck... we just bought a new car!  (Yep... another 2.0T - 274 hp provided by the twin-scroll turbo!)

Next month... we'll be takin' the new car (Steffi) on vacation - "The Land of the Pines." (Yep... I'm talkin' South Carolina... Charleston to be precise... no doubt with a side trip to Savannah in the cards!) Yep... our annual trip to visit Pat, Vicki, and The Boys.

Summer vacation...? We're still considering. If for whatever reason (Kim's upcoming American wedding perhaps) we decide to "go easy" on summer vacation as opposed to making it an extravaganza it'll be more out of concern for time and energy than financial constraints. 

Oh... oh... oh...! And as to the fall... it's Key West or bust! (If Ted and Mary can't accompany us... well... we'll be sad... but we'll drink for them!)

My whole point in this particular newsbites posting intro...? Nope. Not to brag! No... my purpose is to publicly give thanks! I recognize how wonderful my life is... how good I have it!

I'm grateful! Grateful to God... grateful to my wife and child for being who they are... grateful to that combination of luck and hard work that has given me an overall lifestyle which suits my needs, wants, and personality!

Folks... think about our lives compared to most people on earth! We have it friggin' made! Hey... I'm not sayin' we're not destroying America. We are! (They are!) I catalog my evidence day in and day out right here on this blog! But... but... in terms of "lifestyle"... while Mary and I may not live in a mansion, our overall lifestyle is pretty high end. Vacations... restaurants... cars...

We're warm and dry in the winter... cool and dry in the summer...

Our bellies are full... (OK... ok... "overly filled" in my particular case... but thanks to BodyPump I'm looking damn good above the belly!)

Anyway... you folks no doubt get my point. 

Take a moment... pause... throw out a prayer of thanksgiving for your own blessings, folks! If you're not big on prayer... think about your parents... your upbringing... your best teachers and your own best decisions! Silently thank all of those who had something to do with your own success!

And, now... all this written... don't forget to check back later... tonight... tomorrow... to check out today's newsbites!


Sunday, April 20, 2014

Easter Sunday Newsbites: April 20, 2014


Yep... Happy Easter Sunday, folks!

I'm posting this late on "Saturday" night because I'm busting with the news...

GUESS WHO BOUGHT A NEW CAR (yesterday, technically) ON SATURDAY?

YES...! US...!

Last week we received a free $10 Kohl's marketing outreach gift card in the mail...

(Bear with me! I'll get back to the new car in a moment!)

 ...good through this (now past) Saturday. So... today... we went out to find something to use it on rather than let it expire and go to waste.

Anyway... I found a clearance polo shirt at the Kohl's in Ramsey, NJ for $12 and so with no sales tax on clothing in NJ... I ended up getting a (originally priced) $36 shirt for $2.

Well, folks... I was so damned happy with my bargain that I said "what the hell" and the next thing you know we were at the Hyundai dealership a mile up the road trading in Sammie, our (now former) 2011 Sonata 2.0T with 58,649 miles (with the bumper-to-bumper warranty set to expire at 60K) for a brand spanking new 2014 Sonata 2.0T.

(Stephanie the Sonata... "Steffi" for short!)

In all seriousness, we had been talking about perhaps looking into turning Sammie in if we could get a good enough deal, but on the other hand, today's actual buy can be looked upon as an "impulse purchase."

(*GUFFAW*)

Yep... I know... Bill Barker, the guy who researches every  purchase beyond pocket change to death "impulse purchasing" a friggin' new car...

(*STILL LAUGHING*)

I tell ya... I crack myself up...!!!

Anyway... that's my car story I couldn't wait till morning to share!

Hopefully I'll get a chance to post an actual newsbite or two tomorrow, but if I don't get around to it... I ask your forgiveness in advance.

(*WINK*)

Have a GREAT EASTER everyone! I know I will!


Friday, April 18, 2014

Barker's Newsbites: Friday, April 18, 2014


Santa's comin'...!!!

SANTA'S COMIN'...!!!

(*PAUSE*)

(*SILENCE*)

Oh... no...? Not Santa...?!?!

OH...!!! The BUNNY is comin'...!!!

(Sorry about that, folks; it's been a long week...)

Thursday, April 17, 2014

Barker's Newsbites: Thursday, April 17, 2014


Yep... anyone paying attention to the time-stamp... it's past 1:35 a.m.

Lots of good posts over the last couple days; found myself still blogging after midnight and so I figured I'd get an early start on Thursday's newsbites!

Enjoy!

And... learn...

Still Standing With Bundy


What can I tell ya, folks... I still stand with Cliven Bundy.

From Tuesday's Washington Times... Valerie Richardson reporting...

*  *  *  *  *  * 


Sending scores of armed agents along with helicopters and dogs to confront an elderly Nevada rancher over grazing fees may seem like overkill, but critics say it’s not inconsistent with the federal government’s recent approach to environmental enforcement.

* THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION'S RECENT "APPROACH" TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT... SELECT... POLITICIZED... ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT.

The simmering truce between the Bundys and the Bureau of Land Management comes after high-profile raids last year by armed federal agents on small-time gold miners in tiny Chicken, Alaska, and guitar makers at the Gibson Guitar facilities in Tennessee.

* REMEMBER GIBSON...?

* OR RATHER... REMEMBER GIBSON!

That doesn’t include more subtle threats, such as recent efforts by the Obama administration to raise grazing fees or pressure permit holders to transfer their water rights as a condition of renewal, said Ryan Yates, director of congressional relations for the American Farm Bureau.

* DOES THIS SOUND LIKE YOUR AMERICA MY FRIENDS... THE HOME OF THE FREE...?

“Some have called it a culture of intimidation,” Mr. Yates said. “It’s issue after issue, threat after threat. It’s becoming harder and harder to keep those operations in business.”

* HEY... WHO NEEDS FARMERS?! WHO NEEDS RANCHERS?! WHO NEEDS MINERS... OR NATURAL RESOURCES... OR FOOD...?!

(*JUST SHAKING MY HEAD*)

The atmosphere was quiet but tense Tuesday at the Bundy ranch near Bunkerville, NV., just days after Bureau of Land Management chief Neil Kornze pulled federal agents off the property and returned about 400 head of cattle to rancher Cliven Bundy.

* FIVE BULLS WERE SLAUGHTERED... PRIVATE PROPERTY DELIBERATELY DESTROYED...

* APPARENTLY BY "DOMESTIC TERRORISTS" CONTRACTED BY THE FEDERAL BLM ITSELF.

(*SHRUG*)

A BLM spokesman said the agency would work to resolve the dispute “administratively and judicially,” but so far Bundy supporters aren’t buying it. Patrols of armed supporters remained at the ranch on the lookout for the return of BLM agents instead of heeding calls from lawmakers to disband and return home, according to KLAS-TV in Las Vegas.

* REMAIN AT THE RANCH... ON PRIVATE PROPERTY... WITH THE OWNER'S CONSENT...

That may be in part because Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid warned Monday that “it’s not over.”

* HARRY REID IS A CORRUPT PIECE OF $HIT AND IF YOU DON'T ALREADY KNOW THIS THEN I URGE YOU TO DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.

Meanwhile, former Rep. Ron Paul, Texas Republican, told Fox News he worried the federal government could hit back hard at the Bundy ranch.

“The other thing is, governments don’t give up their power easily, and they may well come back with a lot more force, like they did at Waco with the Davidians,” said Mr. Paul, referring to the deadly 1993 federal raid on the Branch Davidian compound. “So I don’t know which way it’s going, but so far, so good.”

* WE'RE NOT TALKING THE DAVIDIANS. WE'RE TALKING THE LAST REMAINING RANCHER IN A COUNTY WHERE RANCHING USED TO BE A RESPECTED, LUCRATIVE, AND HONORABLE LIVELIHOOD - NOT TO MENTION BENEFICIAL TO THE COUNTY, STATE, AND FEDERAL ECONOMY!

Examples of hostile behavior by federal agencies prompted an Oct. 29 oversight hearing by a House Natural Resources subcommittee on “Threats, Intimidation and Bullying by Federal Land Managing Agencies.” Rep. Rob Bishop, Utah Republican, said in his opening statement at the time that the hearing would feature “a number of troubling cases in which federal land managing agencies have employed abusive tactics to extort rural families into giving up property rights or to bully farmers and ranchers into making concessions to which the federal agency had no legal right.”

* CRIMINALS WITH FEDERAL IDs...

While Mr. Bundy has been criticized for failing to pay his grazing fees, a move made after federal efforts to limit grazing after the desert tortoise was listed as threatened, the BLM’s over-the-top response has helped turn him into a sympathetic figure among rural Westerners.

* FOLKS! THE GRAZING FEES WERE SUPPOSED TO GO TOWARDS ASSISTING RANCHERS, NOT PUTTING THEM OUT OF BUSINESS! AGAIN... DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH! THE FEDS ARE USING REGULATIONS AS A WEAPON AGAINST RANCHERS AND FARMERS! READ (OR RE-READ) MY STAND ALONE POSTING "I STAND WITH BUNDY" AND READ (OR RE-READ) THE LAST TWO DAYS WORTH OF NEWSBITES!

“I think there are many people who object to someone not paying grazing fees but who also find the federal government’s behavior in this situation in particular, and with regard to management of the enormous federal estate in general, to be increasingly indefensible — intimidating, destructive and cruel,” said Heritage Foundation senior adviser Robert Gordon.

As Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval put it shortly after the BLM’s arrival, “No cow justifies the atmosphere of intimidation, which currently exists, nor the limitation of constitutional rights that are sacred to all Nevadans.”

* SANDOVAL SHOULD HAVE SENT STATE POLICE - AND IF NECESSARY HIS NATIONAL GUARD - TO PROTECT BUNDY... HIS RANCH... AND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE STATE OF NEVADA.

 

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Barker's Newsbites: Wednesday, April 16, 2014


So... looking out the window at snow... on April Friggin' 16th... what's a man to do but skip the gym, pour a slug of Irish into his coffee, and get bloggin'!

(*HUGE FRIGGIN' GRIN*)

I Stand With Bundy


Folks, I was taking a bit of a break from blogging during the "active" phase of the BLM vs. Bundy stand-off. That said, I'm sure it'll come as no surprise to any of you that... I stand with Bundy.

Overall... the media reporting has been dismal. One really has to dig in order to find answers, and even then... questions remain.

John Hinderaker - attorney and co-founder of the Powerline Blog - published a piece the other day that may shed some light on the greater issues at play here for you. Of course, I "barkerize" it... throw in my own questions and two-cents worth of opinion... but bottom line... Hinderaker's piece throws some much needed light upon the broader issues at play.

Here goes...

*  *  *  *  *  *


On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are.

First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on.

The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay.

* FOLKS... TO UNDERSTAND THIS STORY YOU'VE GOT TO ASK QUESTIONS. I'M GONNA BE ASKING SOME... ASK YOURSELF IF HAVING ANSWERS WOULDN'T CLARIFY THINGS!

* FIRST QUESTION... BY WHAT RIGHT DOES THE BLM CHARGE GRAZING FEES AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE?

Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can graze and the number that can graze, and Bundy has ignored those directives.

As a result, BLM has sued Bundy twice in federal court, and won both cases.

In the second, more recent action, Bundy’s defense is that the federal government doesn’t own the land in question and therefore has no authority to regulate grazing. That simply isn’t right; the land, like most of Nevada, is federally owned.

* BUT HOW AND WHY IS MOST OF IT FEDERALLY OWNED...??? DID THE STATES SELL THE LAND TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT? THIS IS WHERE CLARIFICATION AND HISTORY REALLY NEED TO BE BROUGHT INTO PLAY.

Bundy is representing himself, of necessity: no lawyer could make that argument.

* BUT IF THE ARGUMENT IS SO CLEAR... WHY ISN'T THE HISTORY AND LOGIC OF THE FEDERAL LAND OWNERSHIP THE FOREMOST CENTER OF THIS DEBATE...???

* AND... FOLKS... NOTE... WE'RE TALKING THE EARLY 1990's... WHAT WAS THE NORM OF UNDERSTANDING THE LEGALITIES OF THE PRESENT SITUATION IN... SAY... THE NEAR 140 YEARS PRIOR TO THE BLM ARRIVAL ON THE SCENE...??? (I MEAN... WE'RE ALWAYS TAUGHT PRECEDENT PLAYS SUCH A LARGE PART IN THE LAW...)

[W]hy does Bundy deserve our sympathy? To begin with, his family has been ranching on the acres at issue since the late 19th century. They and other settlers were induced to come to Nevada in part by the federal government’s promise that they would be able to graze their cattle on adjacent government-owned land. For many years they did so, with no limitations or fees. The Bundy family was ranching in southern Nevada long before the BLM came into existence.

Over the last two or three decades, the Bureau has squeezed the ranchers in southern Nevada by limiting the acres on which their cattle can graze, reducing the number of cattle that can be on federal land, and charging grazing fees for the ever-diminishing privilege. The effect of these restrictions has been to drive the ranchers out of business. Formerly, there were dozens of ranches in the area where Bundy operates. Now, his ranch is the only one.

* THINK ABOUT THAT, FOLKS... Formerly, there were dozens of ranches in the area where Bundy operates. Now, his ranch is the only one.

* THINK ABOUT THAT, FOLKS... Over the last two or three decades, the Bureau has squeezed the ranchers in southern Nevada by limiting the acres on which their cattle can graze, reducing the number of cattle that can be on federal land, and charging grazing fees for the ever-diminishing privilege. The effect of these restrictions has been to drive the ranchers out of business.

When Bundy refused to pay grazing fees beginning in around 1993, he said something to the effect of, they are supposed to be charging me a fee for managing the land and all they are doing is trying to manage me out of business. Why should I pay them for that?

* GOOD QUESTION! (AND QUESTION... WHAT EXACTLY IS THE OFFICIAL PURPOSE OF THE BLM? SURELY IT'S NOT TO DESTROY AMERICAN CATTLE RANCHERS? AND WHAT PRECISELY DOES THE ENABLING LANGUAGE OF THE GRAZING FEE LEGISLATION SAY THE PURPOSE FOR THE FEE IS? IS THE FEE BEING USED FOR THAT PURPOSE? IF NOT... THEN WHO EXACTLY SHOULD BE IN TROUBLE FOR BREAKING THE LAW...?)

The bedrock issue here is that the federal government owns more than 80% of the state of Nevada.

* WHY...?!?!

This is true across the western states.

* WHY...?!?!

To an astonishing degree, those states lack sovereignty over their own territory.

* AND JUST ON THE FACE OF IT... WHEN YOU THINK UPON IT... HOW IN HELL CAN THAT PASS CONSTITUTIONAL MUSTER?!

Most of the land is federal. And the federal agencies that rule over federal lands have agendas. At every opportunity, it seems, they restrict not only what can be done on federal lands, but on privately-owned property. They are hostile to traditional industries like logging, mining and ranching, and if you have a puddle in your back yard, the EPA will try to regulate it as a navigable waterway. (That is only a slight exaggeration.) One could say that Cliven Bundy is just one more victim of progress and changing mores.

The federal government has gotten more environmentally-conscious, and now we really, really care about desert tortoises. (It was the designation of desert tortoises as an endangered species that gave BLM the opportunity to squeeze Bundy in the early 1990s.) But here’s the thing: the Bureau of Land Management – the federal government – is not necessarily anti-development. Rather, its attitude depends entirely on what sort of development is in question.

Thus, BLM has developed a grandiose plan to develop vast solar energy installations on federal land across the Southwest. Wind power projects are favored, too. In fact, the same BLM that has driven Nevada’s ranchers out of business has welcomed solar projects with open arms. Some have claimed that Harry Reid is behind the BLM’s war against Cliven Bundy, on the theory that he wants the land for a solar project in which his son Rory is involved, along with the Chinese. I don’t believe this is correct. The solar projects are located north of Las Vegas, 30 miles or so from the area where Bundy ranches. But the connection is nevertheless important in two respects. First, BLM has promulgated a regional mitigation strategy for the environmental impacts of the solar developments.

Let’s pause on that for a moment: the excuse for limiting Bundy’s rights is the endangered desert tortoise. But wait! Don’t they have desert tortoises a few miles away where the solar projects are being built? Of course they do. That’s where they get to the mitigation strategy, which may involve, among other things, moving some desert tortoises to a new location:

Second, the Gold Butte ACEC is preliminarily recommended as the best recipient location for regional mitigation from the Dry Lake SEZ. This ACEC is located 32 miles (51 km) east of the Dry Lake SEZ. Gold Butte is the area where Bundy ranches. There are a few problems with the Gold Butte location as a mitigation area; one of them is that there are “trespassing” cattle.

So it is possible that the federal government is driving Bundy off federal lands to make way for mitigation activities that enable the solar energy development to the north. But I don’t think it is necessary to go there. Rather – this is the second and more important point – it is obvious that some activities are favored by the Obama administration’s BLM, and others are disfavored. The favored developments include solar and wind projects. No surprise there: the developers of such projects are invariably major Democratic Party donors. Wind and solar energy survive only by virtue of federal subsidies, so influencing people like Barack Obama and Harry Reid is fundamental to the developers’ business plans. Ranchers, on the other hand, ask nothing from the federal government other than the continuation of their historic rights. It is a safe bet that Cliven Bundy is not an Obama or Reid contributor.

* BOTTOM LINE.. CRONY CAPITALISM... PUBLIC-PRIVATE "SOCIALISM"... WHATEVER YOU WANNA CALL IT. BUT BOTTOM LINE, IT'S POLITICAL... AND IT'S CORRUPT.

The new head of the BLM is a former Reid staffer. Presumably he was placed in his current position on Reid’s recommendation. Harry Reid is known to be a corrupt politician, one who has gotten wealthy on a public employee’s salary, in part, at least, by benefiting from sweetheart real estate deals. Does Harry Reid now control more than 80% of the territory of Nevada?

If you need federal authority to conduct business in Nevada – which is overwhelmingly probable – do you need to pay a bribe to Harry Reid or a member of his family to get that permission?

Why is it that the BLM is deeply concerned about desert tortoises when it comes to ranchers, but couldn’t care less when the solar power developers from China come calling?

Environmentalists have asked this question.

Does the difference lie in the fact that Cliven Bundy has never contributed to an Obama or Reid campaign, or paid a bribe to Reid or a member of his family?

Based on the evidence, I would say: yes, that is probably the difference. When the desert tortoises balance out, Occam’s razor tells us that the distinction is political.

So let’s have some sympathy for Cliven Bundy and his family. They don’t have a chance on the law, because under the Endangered Species Act and many other federal statutes, the agencies are always in the right. And their way of life is one that, frankly, is on the outs. They don’t develop apps. They don’t ask for food stamps. It probably has never occurred to them to bribe a politician. They don’t subsist by virtue of government subsidies or regulations that hamstring competitors. They aren’t illegal immigrants. They have never even gone to law school. So what possible place is there for the Bundys in the Age of Obama?